2014 16th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icton.2014.6876538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicon photodetectors based on internal photoemission effect: The challenge of detecting near infrared light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extracting energetic carriers from light absorption in so-called hot carrier Schottky barrier (SB) junctions has attracted enormous attention, as it allows harvesting low photon energies that have so far been omitted from semiconductor photodetectors. Since metals offer zero bandgap energy, their operation can in principle cover visible, mid-infrared, terahertz, and microwave regimes, which holds great promises for gas detection, , imaging sensors, wavelength determination, , power monitoring, and sustainable power supplies. Taking silicon photodetectors (with a bandgap energy of 1.1 eV) for instance, exploitation of SB devices can result in a highly integrated CMOS-compatible and inexpensive alternative to commercially used germanium (Ge) and gallium arsenide (GaAs) photodetectors at telecommunication wavelengths. , , SB junctions consist of a metal–semiconductor (SC) contact where the difference in the work function of both materials leads to an energy band bending at the interface due to Fermi energy alignment on both sides via charge carrier diffusion and generation currents . However, this holds true only when the dipole at the interface generated by surface defects is not taken into consideration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracting energetic carriers from light absorption in so-called hot carrier Schottky barrier (SB) junctions has attracted enormous attention, as it allows harvesting low photon energies that have so far been omitted from semiconductor photodetectors. Since metals offer zero bandgap energy, their operation can in principle cover visible, mid-infrared, terahertz, and microwave regimes, which holds great promises for gas detection, , imaging sensors, wavelength determination, , power monitoring, and sustainable power supplies. Taking silicon photodetectors (with a bandgap energy of 1.1 eV) for instance, exploitation of SB devices can result in a highly integrated CMOS-compatible and inexpensive alternative to commercially used germanium (Ge) and gallium arsenide (GaAs) photodetectors at telecommunication wavelengths. , , SB junctions consist of a metal–semiconductor (SC) contact where the difference in the work function of both materials leads to an energy band bending at the interface due to Fermi energy alignment on both sides via charge carrier diffusion and generation currents . However, this holds true only when the dipole at the interface generated by surface defects is not taken into consideration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this theory does not take the thickness of the Schottky metal layer into consideration. Over the years the original theory of IPE has been refined largely resulting in much better assessment of the performance of the devices based on this effect [27,28].…”
Section: Photodetection Mechanisms In 2d Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several new structures have been reported in literature combining, for example, IPA with nanoscale metallic structures, comprising Si nanoparticles (NPs) [ 39 ], metal stripes allowing surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) [ 40 , 41 ], metallic gratings [ 42 ] and new structures based on two-dimensional materials (like graphene) capable to substitute metal in the Schottky junction [ 43 ]. Moreover, as reported in some complete review on this topic [ 44 , 45 ], due to the unipolar nature of the Schottky junction, IPE based PDs are very fast and can be monolithically integrated with Si-based CCD for IR applications [ 46 ].…”
Section: Group IV Semiconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%