2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silica–Epoxy Vitrimer Nanocomposites

Abstract: Reinforced silica–epoxy vitrimer nanocomposites have been made in a solvent-free, easily processable, and economical way with filler contents up to 40 wt %. Increasing silica content leads to higher modulus materials in both glassy and rubbery regions. These nanocomposites are insoluble like permanent cross-linked networks but can completely relax stresses by thermoactivated exchange reactions that rearrange the network topology. Furthermore, the surface functionalization of particles improves the dispersion o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
152
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
7
152
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As Figure 7A shows, the composite that does not contain any exchangeable bonds exhibits the highest degree of shrinkage stress, 0.7 MPa, while the formulation containing exchangeable bonds both throughout the network and at the particle interface (AN–AI) exhibits the lowest degree of shrinkage stress, only 0.2 MPa. While this substantial difference is to be expected, [34] a truly surprising result is observed when comparing samples that limit AFT capabilities to either the resin (AN) or the interface (AI). Figure 7B shows that the PN–AI composite where AFT is limited to the interface exhibits similar values of toughness and tensile strength to AN–PI composite where AFT occurs only in the resin despite having an order of magnitude fewer dynamic bonds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Figure 7A shows, the composite that does not contain any exchangeable bonds exhibits the highest degree of shrinkage stress, 0.7 MPa, while the formulation containing exchangeable bonds both throughout the network and at the particle interface (AN–AI) exhibits the lowest degree of shrinkage stress, only 0.2 MPa. While this substantial difference is to be expected, [34] a truly surprising result is observed when comparing samples that limit AFT capabilities to either the resin (AN) or the interface (AI). Figure 7B shows that the PN–AI composite where AFT is limited to the interface exhibits similar values of toughness and tensile strength to AN–PI composite where AFT occurs only in the resin despite having an order of magnitude fewer dynamic bonds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic nanoparticles with aggregation induced emission properties based on dynamic bonds have previously been developed. [2931] Fiber-reinforced composites, [32] carbon nanotube composites, [33] and silica nanocomposites [34] made of a dynamic epoxy resin have been investigated. Also, transesterification-based shape memory composites based on graphene-filled vitrimers were prepared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vitrimers belong to the second category of CANs in which the crosslinking bonds have an associative nature resulting in the ability of the material to change its topology via exchange reactions. These reactions normally are triggered by heat, which causes the gradual decrease in system viscosity with increasing temperature and provides malleability to the network.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since vitrimerization also allows for the processing of a thermoset just like a thermoplastic, it affords the unique advantage of incorporating fillers into the thermoset network during recycling to compensate for the drop in mechanical properties due to the catalyst. The addition of fillers to enhance the properties of vitrimers has already been studied extensively . Just as an example, 10 wt% of highly branched carbon nanotubes with a diameter of 7–9 nm known as carbon nanostructures (CNS) were extruded along with the vitrimerized PU samples with the same parameters mentioned above and tested for mechanical properties as can be seen in Figure c.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Dynamic networks based on Diels-Alder exchange reactions [12,13] form an example of dissociative covalent adaptive networks.On the other hand, in the case of associative CANs, a crosslinking bond does not break until a new bond forms, which makes the network permanent and dynamic. Vitrimers [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] are polymeric associative covalent adaptive networks that exhibit a gradual viscosity decrease upon heating, which is a distinctive character of vitreous silica. The cross-linking bonds of such networks have an associative nature which results in the ability of the material to change its topology via exchange reactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%