“…It is also the dominant adsorbent in industry, based on its great adsorption ability, high surface area, stability, and homogeneity, which outweigh the high cost of production and regeneration and the possibility of decreased efficiency due to material loss during regeneration. ,, A few examples using activated carbon for AQ dye adsorption showed that uptake was higher for acidic solutions, − and that pore structure of the materials could facilitate , or hinder adsorption. Another frequently discussed option in the area of adsorption is the abundant in nature zeolites, with substantially lower adsorption capacity and again facing high regeneration costs. , Silicon based materials have been studied extensively for pollutant adsorption as well. , Their interesting properties such as ability for a wide range of pore size and surface areas, durability, ease of functionalization and relatively cheaper regeneration compared to activated carbon, have made them excellent candidates for water treatment with many examples of dye adsorption. − However, issues such as manufacturing and regeneration cost, as well as diffusional limitations arising from high throughput in industrial scale applications, have prevented them from being widely applied in water treatment yet, although research is showing positive signs on their industrial implementation . Newer trends in adsorption, with application for AQ dyes, include the use of agricultural waste. , As per filtration, the usually encountered textile effluent treatments include nanofiltration (pore diameter up to 10 nm) and reverse osmosis, but there was no example of their application on AQ dyes found in literature.…”