1915
DOI: 10.1037/h0071709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silent versus oral reading with one hundred sixth-grade children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1940
1940
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He found students read more material and recalled more points during silent reading as compared to their oral reading. Mead (1915) observed similar results when he focused on the same two aspects (amount of material read and number of points recalled) Downloaded by [University of Sydney] at 06:34 03 January 2015 comparing silent and oral reading of sixth grade students. He questioned the importance of oral reading and felt the act of articulating every word aloud may actually slow the reader's speed even in silent reading.…”
Section: Area Reading Instructionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He found students read more material and recalled more points during silent reading as compared to their oral reading. Mead (1915) observed similar results when he focused on the same two aspects (amount of material read and number of points recalled) Downloaded by [University of Sydney] at 06:34 03 January 2015 comparing silent and oral reading of sixth grade students. He questioned the importance of oral reading and felt the act of articulating every word aloud may actually slow the reader's speed even in silent reading.…”
Section: Area Reading Instructionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the early 1900's, researchers were debating the issue of oral reading versus silent reading (Pintner, 1913;Mead, 1915;Pintner & Gilliland, 1916;Thorndike, 1917;Judd & Buswell, 1922;Good, 1925). Pintner (1913) studied the oral and silent reading of fourth grade students.…”
Section: Area Reading Instructionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous research designed to answer this question has provided mixed results (Fuchs et al, 1988;Juel & Holmes, 1981;McCallum, Sharp, Bell, & George, 2004). Some research studies have shown that students comprehend significantly more information when they read silently than they do when they read aloud (Jones & Lockhart, 1919;Mead, 1915Mead, , 1917Pinter, 1913). Other studies report findings indicating that students comprehend significantly more when they read aloud compared to when they read silently (Collins, 1961;Duffy & Durrell, 1935-36;Hale et al, 2007;Rowell, 1976).…”
Section: Impact Of Oral Versus Silent Reading On Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Actually, he alleges, his tests covered the more important ideas. (88,148,173) Yoakam ( 254) also compared the effectiveness of a single reading with the effectiveness of two consecutive readings. His subjects improved their scores comparatively little by the second reading.…”
Section: Methods Of Studyingmentioning
confidence: 99%