1940
DOI: 10.1037/h0063014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments on learning in school situations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1942
1942
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
(126 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using himself as the single participant in his studies, Ebbinghaus investigated the retention of nonsense syllables after retention intervals of different lengths, with the aim of discovering 'pure' measures of retention. Quite consistently, he found what later came to be called the 'Ebbinghaus' curve of forgetting,' that is, a negatively accelerated forgetting function (e.g., Stroud 1940). This function is characterized by large losses at short retention intervals, after which the curve levels off to smaller (but incremental) losses at longer intervals.…”
Section: Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using himself as the single participant in his studies, Ebbinghaus investigated the retention of nonsense syllables after retention intervals of different lengths, with the aim of discovering 'pure' measures of retention. Quite consistently, he found what later came to be called the 'Ebbinghaus' curve of forgetting,' that is, a negatively accelerated forgetting function (e.g., Stroud 1940). This function is characterized by large losses at short retention intervals, after which the curve levels off to smaller (but incremental) losses at longer intervals.…”
Section: Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the analysis, retention is related to the participants' knowledge level at the end of the exposure (often expressed as number and level of courses attended) and the length of the RI. Due to the non-longitudinal character of this type of study, retention curves can only be reconstructed, though reliable information about the amount or proportion of forgetting can be collected (Stroud 1940). For those long time spans, groups of participants who have learned the material under similar circumstances may be hard to find (Bahrick 1993;Schmidt et al 2000); in fact, it may not entirely be clear whether they learned the same knowledge at all, in particular for knowledge domains that change over time (Day et al 1988).…”
Section: Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first full review of research literature in this area appears to have been the one by Welborn and English (1937), who were concerned mainly with the differences between what they called "verbatim" and "logical" learning. (Roughly, "verbatim" learning is learning of a discourse, i. e., its exact words, while "logical" learning is learning from a discourse, i.e., its content~d ideas.) Stroud (1940) touched on certain problems of MVD learnir.g in his review of research in school learning. Although a number of psychologists have mounted research programs on learning from t4VD (e.g., Cofer, 1941Cofer, , 1956) there appears to have been no major literature review of findings since the Welborn and English review cited above.…”
Section: Previous Reviews Of Learning From Mvdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively few studies have been concerned with the retention of verbal materials over extended time intervals, and this · has been especially true with respect to the recall method of measuring retention ( 3,4,5,6). The present note reports a few data which · are relevant to this question .…”
Section: Charles N Cofermentioning
confidence: 92%