Abstract:This literature review engages mental illness in adult education (AE) to locate what research exists and to suggest a research agenda moving forward. This structured review located research related to mental health issues published in the conference proceedings of the Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education (CASAE) and the Adult Education Research Conference (AERC) and fourteen international AE journals. AE scholarship focused on identity construction, andragogy and classroom issues, public pedag… Show more
“…There is a shortfall of mentally ‘Othered’ males normalizing their own entangles with mental illness in adult education (AE) (Brookfield, ; Procknow, 2017a). Psychiatrized voices in AE have been vitiated by years of imprisoning silence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychiatrized voices in AE have been vitiated by years of imprisoning silence. This “silence begets sanism” (Procknow, 2017a, p. 18). Sanism is defined as when those who are diagnosed, labelled, or branded as ‘mentally ill’ are defamed and derogated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their mental difference is ‘Othered’ and tarred as inferior (Perlin, ). Yet, the mental ‘Otherization’ and oppression of ‘mad’ folk is seldom ever named in critical pedagogy as sanism (Castrodale, ; Procknow, 2017a). It is only recently that mad scholarship has started to enter into AE and begun to capture mad students’ voices and lived experience (Brookfield, ; Castrodale, ).…”
This article is an autoethnographic vignette of a schizoaffective sufferer learning about ‘saneness’ from slasher films. In this paper, theories from popular culture as pedagogy, Mad Studies, and cultivation theory, are used to confirm that saneness in motion pictures (specifically slasher films) can be conceptualized as a site of critical pedagogy. In addition, this paper relates the ways in which sane performativity in slasher films is consumable and made educative by inducting a new notion into adult education and Mad Studies: the pedagogy of saneness. This paper concludes that in order for viewers to steady their shattered psyches they have to learn to live with their ‘abnormality’ rather than shirk it into oblivion.
“…There is a shortfall of mentally ‘Othered’ males normalizing their own entangles with mental illness in adult education (AE) (Brookfield, ; Procknow, 2017a). Psychiatrized voices in AE have been vitiated by years of imprisoning silence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychiatrized voices in AE have been vitiated by years of imprisoning silence. This “silence begets sanism” (Procknow, 2017a, p. 18). Sanism is defined as when those who are diagnosed, labelled, or branded as ‘mentally ill’ are defamed and derogated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their mental difference is ‘Othered’ and tarred as inferior (Perlin, ). Yet, the mental ‘Otherization’ and oppression of ‘mad’ folk is seldom ever named in critical pedagogy as sanism (Castrodale, ; Procknow, 2017a). It is only recently that mad scholarship has started to enter into AE and begun to capture mad students’ voices and lived experience (Brookfield, ; Castrodale, ).…”
This article is an autoethnographic vignette of a schizoaffective sufferer learning about ‘saneness’ from slasher films. In this paper, theories from popular culture as pedagogy, Mad Studies, and cultivation theory, are used to confirm that saneness in motion pictures (specifically slasher films) can be conceptualized as a site of critical pedagogy. In addition, this paper relates the ways in which sane performativity in slasher films is consumable and made educative by inducting a new notion into adult education and Mad Studies: the pedagogy of saneness. This paper concludes that in order for viewers to steady their shattered psyches they have to learn to live with their ‘abnormality’ rather than shirk it into oblivion.
“…Like Greg Procknow (Procknow, ), I am implicated in any adult educational discussion of mental illness, having been diagnosed with clinical depression and anxiety. So it's refreshing for me to see his piece appear in this journal.…”
Like Greg Procknow (Procknow, 2017), I am implicated in any adult educational discussion of mental illness, having been diagnosed with clinical depression and anxiety. So it's refreshing for me to see his piece appear in this journal. Like him, I've lamented the lack of sustained attention on how people learn to deal with a supposed absence of normality in their lives. Learning to live with a classification of mental illness is a multifaceted learning project involving everything from learning to undergo ideological detoxification to instituting biofeedback processes, working out the political calculus of disclosure to managing timings, dosages and combinations of medications. At its root of course, as Greg eloquently argues, is the challenging of the very notions of madness and sanity.
“…Procknow () seeks to define a problem of gaps in the AE research. He takes up a mad analysis, to work with and within the language of madness and Mad Studies to ascertain the extent AE engages mental illness.…”
I am writing this in response to the editor's invitation to provide a reaction to Greg Procknow's article in this issue. Procknow's article provides a review of recent Adult Education (AE) literature to see how AE engages mental illness and more specifically the language of madness. My first reaction to the article was to be swayed by its well-written madvocacy argument as it made a persuasive case that anti-sanist analyses were both lacking and necessary for AE research in order to increase accessibility and equity for consumers/survivors/expatients of the mental health system. After this initial reaction, however, I realized that while I saw great value in the article's anti-sanist message I wanted to see more emphasis on an inclusive anti-sanism and Mad Studies research tent that created space for more AE researchers like myself. I also saw that Procknow, like many other AE scholars, had not separated AE research and practice in his analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.