2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2013000500009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silagem de milho ou de cana-de-açúcar com Lactobacillus buchneri exclusivamente ou em associação com L. plantarum

Abstract: 5 ufc g -1 de L. buchneri. As silagens foram armazenadas por 150 dias. O tratamento das silagens de milho não afetou a maioria das variáveis relacionadas ao valor nutritivo, às características fermentativas, aos perfis microbiológicos, às perdas e à estabilidade aeróbia. Nas silagens de cana-de-açúcar, o tratamento com L. buchneri apresentou maior teor de matéria seca, sem apresentar diferenças para as variáveis de valor nutritivo. Além disso, foram observados outros resultados típicos da adição de L. buchneri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some undesirable characteristics restrict the use of sugarcane silage, including intense alcoholic fermentation when the forage is ensiled pure (Lopes & Evangelista, 2010;Pedroso et al, 2005), dry matter losses and reduced nutritive value (Rezende et al, 2011), and low protein levels and low-quality fiber (Siqueira, Roth, Moretti, Benatti, & Resende, 2012). To control these undesirable characteristics, many additives have been used, including urea (Ribeiro et al, 2010), calcium oxide (Balieiro Neto et al, 2007), virgin lime and limestone (Amaral et al, 2009), sodium chloride (Rezende et al, 2011) and Lactobacillus buchneri (Sá Neto, Nussio, Zopollatto, Junges, & Bispo, 2013). However, some additives can raise production costs and impact the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some undesirable characteristics restrict the use of sugarcane silage, including intense alcoholic fermentation when the forage is ensiled pure (Lopes & Evangelista, 2010;Pedroso et al, 2005), dry matter losses and reduced nutritive value (Rezende et al, 2011), and low protein levels and low-quality fiber (Siqueira, Roth, Moretti, Benatti, & Resende, 2012). To control these undesirable characteristics, many additives have been used, including urea (Ribeiro et al, 2010), calcium oxide (Balieiro Neto et al, 2007), virgin lime and limestone (Amaral et al, 2009), sodium chloride (Rezende et al, 2011) and Lactobacillus buchneri (Sá Neto, Nussio, Zopollatto, Junges, & Bispo, 2013). However, some additives can raise production costs and impact the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, L. plantarum is the most common organism found in tropical forage silage (Pedroso et al 2007. Recently, the addition of heterolactic bacteria, mainly the species of Lactobacillus buchneri, has shown better results, especially in exhibiting higher aerobic stability and inhibition of yeast and fungal proliferation (Avila et al 2009;2010;Sá Neto et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, inoculation of sugarcane silage with L. buchneri has produced inconsistent results on DM loss and aerobic stability Balieiro Neto et al, 2009;Sá Neto, Nussio, Zopollatto, Junges, & Bispo, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%