Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and craniofacial form

Dibbets, J. M. H.; Weele, L T van der

doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70090-2

Cited by 39 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…17 The other two studies provide inconsistent findings, since one investigation did not find any significant association between facial variables and the severity of Craniomandibular Index, 18 whilst the other study shows an association, even if weak, with an increased craniocervical angulation. 19 Interestingly, the same study reports that muscle tenderness is associated with a long-face facial morphology and a lower bite force.…”

Section: Summary Of Findings Of Adolescent Studiesmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders in Patients With Different Facial Morphology. A Systematic Review of the Literature

Manfredini

Segù

Arveda

et al. 2016

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Summary Of Findings Of Adolescent Studiesmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Lateral cephalometry was used for facial measurements in all studies. Only one study was longitudinal, 17 and covered a 14-year follow-up period. Single-or multiple-variable regression analyses were adopted for statistical purposes.…”

Section: Summary Of Findings Of Adolescent Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders in Patients With Different Facial Morphology. A Systematic Review of the Literature

Manfredini

Segù

Arveda

et al. 2016

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…22 On the other hand, there is some orthodontic and maxillofacial surgery literature suggesting the existence of a possible skeletal predisposition to TMJ disc displacement due to peculiar features of facial morphology. 23,24 Thus, the possibility that certain occlusal features may be associated with an increased risk for disc displacement was worthy of investigation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental malocclusion is not related to temporomandibular joint clicking: a logistic regression analysis in a patient population

Manfredini

Perinetti

Guarda-Nardini

2013

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To assess the association of several dental malocclusion features with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) click sounds in a population of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients. Materials and Methods: Four hundred forty-two TMD patients (72% female; 32.2 6 5.7 years, range 25-44 years) were divided into a TMJ clicking and a no-TMJ clicking group, based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) assessment. Seven occlusal features were recorded for each patient: (1) posterior crossbite, (2) overbite, (3) open bite, (4) overjet, (5) mediotrusive and (6) laterotrusive interferences and (7) retruded contact position to maximum intercuspation (RCP-MI) slide length. A logistic regression model was created to estimate the association of occlusal features with TMJ clicking. Results: The difference between the groups as for the prevalence of the various occlusal features was generally not statistically significant, with minor exceptions. Mediotrusive interferences (P 5 .015) and RCP-MI slide $2 mm (P 5 .001) were the two occlusal features that were associated with the probability of having TMJ clicking, even if the adjusted odds ratios for TMJ clicking were low for both variables (1.63 and 1.89, respectively). Moreover, the amount of variance in the prevalence of TMJ clicking that was predicted by the final model was as low as 4.5% (R 2 5 0.045). Conclusions: Findings from the present investigation suggested that in a population of TMD patients, the contribution of dental malocclusion features to predict TMJ click sounds is minimal with no clinical relevance. (Angle Orthod. 2014;84:310-315.)

show abstract

“…A cephalometric study has found a shorter sagittal midface amongst those patients who displayed the joint sound [15]. From a biomedical viewpoint, clicking and normal TMJs could be differentiated with levels of cytokines [16] and nitric oxide [17] in the synovial fluid.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

ANKH Polymorphisms and Clicking of the Temporomandibular Joint in Dental Residents

Huang

Takahashi

Goto

et al. 2014

J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim This study aimed to carry out a case-control research study to assess occurrence of clicking of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in order to establish the relationship between TMJ clicking and the genotype of ''ANKH inorganic pyrophosphate transport regulator'' (ANKH) polymorphisms. Materials and Method A sample of 41 first-year dental residents was selected. Each was examined using standard clinical procedures and genotyping techniques. Results The participation rate was 91.8 %. The prevalence of TMJ clicking was 51.2 % (95 % CI: 35.7-66.7 %). Occurrence of TMJ clicking was not related to age, gender and genotypes of ANKH-OR as well as ANKH-TR polymorphisms (p C 0.165). Conclusion A similar distribution of ANKH genotypes in TMJ clicking and asymptomatic individuals has been demonstrated by this study. A high percentage of TMJ clicking has been confirmed. Future investigations are indicated.

show abstract

Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and craniofacial form

Cited by 39 publications

References 8 publications

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders in Patients With Different Facial Morphology. A Systematic Review of the Literature

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders in Patients With Different Facial Morphology. A Systematic Review of the Literature

Dental malocclusion is not related to temporomandibular joint clicking: a logistic regression analysis in a patient population

ANKH Polymorphisms and Clicking of the Temporomandibular Joint in Dental Residents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About