Signing to Signal: Examining Factors Behind Progressive Corporate Activism

McKean, Anna Eileen; King, Brayden G.

doi:10.5465/ambpp.2019.13454abstract

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The emerging phenomenon of corporate-sponsored social activism has attracted much scholarly attention (Crane et al, 2020), with most studies focusing on understanding why corporations deviate from their shareholder value orientation to engage with broader stakeholders in the community (McKean and King, 2019). Some point to institutional pressures and peer influence as the chief explanation (Marquis et al, 2007), while others regard this as a "defensive repertoire" against activist challenges (McDonnell, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate Activism and Corporate Identity

Li¹,

Soule²

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research shows that corporate engagement in social issues often backfires. We suggest this may be because the corporate organizational form is viewed as inappropriate for social activism in general and/or because a particular campaign or organizational action is viewed as hypocritical. To test these ideas, we conduct three studies. In the first study, we examine subject ratings of 90 real-world corporate social movement campaigns and show that subjects support campaigns that involve nonprofit or public organizations, which are of an appropriate organizational form, and penalize campaigns that are inconsistent with the firm business practices, which may be seen as hypocritical. In a second study, we experimentally validate these effects by directly manipulating appropriateness of organizational form and hypocrisy of organizational action. We show that benefit corporations (B Corps) do not suffer from the same hypocrisy penalty in donation and recruitment as do other for-profit corporations, evidencing an interaction between organizational form and action. In a third study, we show that firm collaboration with a social movement organization (SMO) reduces the inappropriateness penalty, while collaboration with an SMO that has organizational practices consistent with the campaign issue reduces the hypocrisy penalty.

show abstract