Despite ample research on the prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders during COVID-19, we know little about the broader psychological impact of the pandemic on a wider population. The study investigates the prevalence and predictors of general psychiatric disorders measured by the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and frequency of loneliness during COVID-19 in the United Kingdom, a country heavily hit by the pandemic. We analyzed 15,530 respondents of the first large-scale, nationally representative survey of COVID-19 in a developed country, the first wave of Understanding Society COVID-19 Study. Results show that 29.2% of the respondents score 4 or more, the caseness threshold, on the general psychiatric disorder measure, and 35.86% of the respondents sometimes or often feel lonely. Regression analyses show that those who have or had COVID-19-related symptoms are more likely to develop general psychiatric disorders and are lonelier. Women and young people have higher risks of general psychiatric disorders and loneliness, while having a job and living with a partner are protective factors. This study showcases the psychological impact, including general psychiatric disorders and loneliness, of broader members of the society during COVID-19 and the underlying social inequalities.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Employed women persistently suffer in mental health despite more family-friendly workplaces. The job demand-control theory argues that employed women’s mental health depends on their job autonomy, while sociological research on the gender division of household labor locates the cause in how much they are expected by husbands to contribute to housework. The article integrates the two streams of literature by arguing that employed women’s job autonomy and their spousal gender ideology interact to shape their mental health. Using nationally representative household-level panel survey and fixed effects models, the study showed that job autonomy improved employed women’s mental health, but the benefits depended on their spousal gender ideologies. Specifically, women suffered a “double jeopardy” in mental health when they lacked job autonomy and had traditional husbands. In contrast, when women’s husbands had an egalitarian gender ideology, they enjoyed mental health regardless of job autonomy. In addition, women’s self-gender ideology did not predict their own or their husbands’ mental health. The results point to a societal-level change in men’s gender ideology as a fundamental way to improve employed women’s family well-being. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11482-022-10090-8.