2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2008.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of the deep layers of entorhinal cortex for transfer of both perirhinal and amygdala inputs to the hippocampus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this evidence, Kajiwara et al (2003) posit that the perirhinal cortex acts as an association area for emotional and sensory information before these types of information enter the hippocampus. This hypothesis is supported by electrophysiological evidence in vitro which shows that the perirhinal cortex does act as a gateway between the amygdala and the hippocampal-parahippocampal network (Koganezawa et al, 2008). Koganezawa et al (2008) also show using slices cut along a different axis to Kajiwara et al (2003) that stimulation of the lateral nucleus or of area 35 alone is enough to propagate information to the entorhinal cortex and dentate gyrus but that simultaneous stimulation of the lateral nucleus and area 36 was needed to elicit a response in the entorhinal cortex or the dentate gyrus.…”
Section: Subcortical Afferents and Efferents Of The Perirhinal Cortexmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on this evidence, Kajiwara et al (2003) posit that the perirhinal cortex acts as an association area for emotional and sensory information before these types of information enter the hippocampus. This hypothesis is supported by electrophysiological evidence in vitro which shows that the perirhinal cortex does act as a gateway between the amygdala and the hippocampal-parahippocampal network (Koganezawa et al, 2008). Koganezawa et al (2008) also show using slices cut along a different axis to Kajiwara et al (2003) that stimulation of the lateral nucleus or of area 35 alone is enough to propagate information to the entorhinal cortex and dentate gyrus but that simultaneous stimulation of the lateral nucleus and area 36 was needed to elicit a response in the entorhinal cortex or the dentate gyrus.…”
Section: Subcortical Afferents and Efferents Of The Perirhinal Cortexmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This hypothesis is supported by electrophysiological evidence in vitro which shows that the perirhinal cortex does act as a gateway between the amygdala and the hippocampal-parahippocampal network (Koganezawa et al, 2008). Koganezawa et al (2008) also show using slices cut along a different axis to Kajiwara et al (2003) that stimulation of the lateral nucleus or of area 35 alone is enough to propagate information to the entorhinal cortex and dentate gyrus but that simultaneous stimulation of the lateral nucleus and area 36 was needed to elicit a response in the entorhinal cortex or the dentate gyrus. Further electrophysiological analysis of these projections is required to fully flesh out the hypothesis of the perirhinal cortex as an associative area for sensory and emotional information although we review the functional evidence for this hypothesis in Section 4.4.…”
Section: Subcortical Afferents and Efferents Of The Perirhinal Cortexmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The projection terminates preferentially in the superficial EC layers (Naber et al, 1997;Burwell and Amaral, 1998b), targeting both principal neurons as well as parvalbumin-positive interneurons in the dorsolateral portions of the EC (Wouterlood et al, 1998). Interestingly, the information transfer from PER to the EC exhibits a strong inhibition in vivo and in vitro (Kajiwara et al, 2003;de Curtis and Paré, 2004;Paz et al, 2006;Pinto et al, 2006;Koganezawa et al, 2008). Neurons in layers II, III and V of POR project to layers I and III of EC (Burwell andAmaral, 1998a, 1998b;Furtak et al, 2007b;Kerr et al, 2007).…”
Section: Entorhinal Cortex (Ec)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal states are assumed to be characterized in terms of the number of activated 'units', such as neurons or neural networks. The area or volume of the assembly of activated units is measured by a time-varying quantity N(t) called an activity level, increasing up to a maximum value of N c (Iijima et al, 1996;Koganezawa et al, 2008). During the time evolution of N(t) the animal follows a particular persistent behavior.…”
Section: Scale-free Behavior Model With Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%