2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rat perirhinal cortex: A review of anatomy, physiology, plasticity, and function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 400 publications
(739 reference statements)
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Prh is located in a pivotal position to influence the flow of information into and out of the hippocampus, and hence, Prh is suggested to be associated with learned fear (Kealy and Commins, 2011;Milad et al, 2006;Rosen and Donley, 2006). Examining the function of the Prh in learned safety, a single study reports that-whereas post-training lesions suggest an involvement of Prh in learned fear-no evidence for effect of lesion on conditioned inhibition was obtained as Prh-lesioned animals retained the capability to inhibit the startle response induced by fear conditioning .…”
Section: Brain Regions Most Likely Not Involved In Learned Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Prh is located in a pivotal position to influence the flow of information into and out of the hippocampus, and hence, Prh is suggested to be associated with learned fear (Kealy and Commins, 2011;Milad et al, 2006;Rosen and Donley, 2006). Examining the function of the Prh in learned safety, a single study reports that-whereas post-training lesions suggest an involvement of Prh in learned fear-no evidence for effect of lesion on conditioned inhibition was obtained as Prh-lesioned animals retained the capability to inhibit the startle response induced by fear conditioning .…”
Section: Brain Regions Most Likely Not Involved In Learned Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the PRC may process some spatial information in rodents (Liu and Bilkey, 1998;Burke et al, 2012). The PRC also receives dense projections from other subcortical structures, including the amygdala, ventral striatum, and ventral tegmental area (Van Hoesen et al, 1981;Pitkanen et al, 2000;Kealy and Commins, 2011). This suggests that reward-related neuromodulatory signals may influence neuronal activity in the PRC Mogami and Tanaka, 2006;Clark et al, 2012;Ohyama et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-access meth leads to deficits in novel object recognition, a basic cognitive function that engages a neural circuit comprising the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and the perirhinal cortex, but only the latter is critical for novelty detection (Kealy and Commins, 2011;Warburton and Brown, 2014). Long-access meth results in a number of neuroadaptations within the perirhinal cortex that may underlie this cognitive deficit, including a downregulation of glutamate receptors, specifically GluN2B-containing N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors (mGlu5; Reichel et al, 2014;Reichel et al, 2011;Scofield et al, 2015), both of which have been implicated in novel object recognition (Barker et al, 2006a;Barker et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesized that such a model would engage the perirhinal cortex, which to date has not been implicated in relapse, despite its extensive interconnectivity with other brain regions, including the prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, and amygdala (Kealy and Commins, 2011), all known to mediate relapse (Nawata et al, 2012;Rocha and Kalivas, 2010). Given that short-access meth rats do not exhibit deficits in novelty recognition (Reichel et al, 2012a;Rogers et al, 2008), and animals have an innate propensity to explore and interact with novel objects (Ennaceur and Delacour, 1988), we hypothesized that a novel cue would invigorate responding as well as a meth cue in short-access rats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%