2000
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of Atypical Glandular Cells of Undetermined Significance on ThinPrep Papanicolaou Smears

Abstract: In women with AGCUS on ThinPrep smears, significant histopathologic findings were found in 34.9% versus 9.8%, depending on the subtype of the smear (favor neoplasia vs reactive). Further studies are needed to validate the cytologic criteria for subtyping AGCUS smears and base management of women with AGCUS cytology on the subtype of the smear.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PPVs for the endocervical AGUS subcategories demonstrated a marked difference between the “favor neoplasia” designation and either the “unspecified” or “favor reactive” designations in both types of preparations (67% vs. 28% vs. 10% in TPs and 77% vs. 23% vs.4% in CPs). These differences are similar to those reported in other studies of biopsy follow‐up results after an AGUS interpretation in CPs,2–16 and in one similar study using TPs,20 and demonstrate that differences in PPVs among endocervical AGUS subcategories are similar in both TPs and CPs. Although the number of cases was small, we found that the AGUS “endometrial” category had a very low PPV in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PPVs for the endocervical AGUS subcategories demonstrated a marked difference between the “favor neoplasia” designation and either the “unspecified” or “favor reactive” designations in both types of preparations (67% vs. 28% vs. 10% in TPs and 77% vs. 23% vs.4% in CPs). These differences are similar to those reported in other studies of biopsy follow‐up results after an AGUS interpretation in CPs,2–16 and in one similar study using TPs,20 and demonstrate that differences in PPVs among endocervical AGUS subcategories are similar in both TPs and CPs. Although the number of cases was small, we found that the AGUS “endometrial” category had a very low PPV in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It has been shown to produce well preserved thin‐layer slides devoid of the artifacts that may contribute to inaccuracies in the interpretation of conventional smears 17, 18. TPs have been shown to increase sensitivity for CIN,19 but to our knowledge there have been relatively few studies of its effectiveness in diagnosing uterine endocervical or endometrial glandular lesions 20–23. Thus, we decided to evaluate our laboratory's experience with AGUS in TP specimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the current study underline the importance of mandatory follow-up of all the patients with AGC on their Pap smears. The present study and the work done by Eltabbakh and colleagues show that a good number of significant histologic findings are detected in the follow-up of patients with AGC/favoring reactive smears (26) . Therefore, this category should always be kept in mind for restricting follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…[17][18][19] Other studies focus on the detection of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, [20][21][22][23][24] an imprecise term, which is recognized to yield more high-grade squamous lesions than high-grade endocervical glandular lesions. 22,[25][26][27] The concurrent presence of cells from an HSIL did not increase the sensitivity of cervical cytology; in fact, cytologists were less likely specifically to recognize a high-grade glandular lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%