2002
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in conventional cervical/vaginal smears and thin-layer preparations

Abstract: Understanding the growth pattern in Marfan syndrome is important for prediction of expected growth, prevention of excessive growth by hormone therapy, timing of surgical epiphysiodesis for cessation of growth, and instituting brace treatment for scoliosis. In this study, we analyze growth patterns and generate growth charts for persons with Marfan syndrome. From the charts of 180 clinically diagnosed Marfan patients, longitudinal height and weight measurements were obtained. From this data, growth charts and g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other systematic and independent reviews have reported similar findings (18,72). Observational data suggest that liquid-based samples may improve the detection of glandular lesions (73)(74)(75).…”
Section: Conventional Pap Screening Versus Liquid-based Cytologymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Other systematic and independent reviews have reported similar findings (18,72). Observational data suggest that liquid-based samples may improve the detection of glandular lesions (73)(74)(75).…”
Section: Conventional Pap Screening Versus Liquid-based Cytologymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…[17][18][19] Other studies focus on the detection of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, [20][21][22][23][24] an imprecise term, which is recognized to yield more high-grade squamous lesions than high-grade endocervical glandular lesions. 22,[25][26][27] The concurrent presence of cells from an HSIL did not increase the sensitivity of cervical cytology; in fact, cytologists were less likely specifically to recognize a high-grade glandular lesion. This finding was true for both the PS group and the TP group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant pathology diagnosed histologically on follow-up ranges from 9% [11] to over 60% [12] of cases. Reports comparing the performance of different preparations demonstrate inconsistent results on the prevalence of AGC, with some reporting higher rates on ThinPrep over conventional preparations [6, 13, 14] and others finding the opposite [15, 16]. There is growing convincing evidence that ThinPrep demonstrates better sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value in detecting significant glandular lesions when compared to the conventional method [3, 6, 15, 16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%