1948
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1948.tb16650.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance in Triangular Taste Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1956
1956
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical significance of each selected attribute was calculated according to Tukey's test (p ≤ 0.05). The significant difference for triangular tests was determined using statistical tables reported by Roessler, Warren, and Guymon [17]. Table 1 shows the enological characteristics of wines obtained with 3 and 6 days of skin maceration of untreated and PEF-treated grapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical significance of each selected attribute was calculated according to Tukey's test (p ≤ 0.05). The significant difference for triangular tests was determined using statistical tables reported by Roessler, Warren, and Guymon [17]. Table 1 shows the enological characteristics of wines obtained with 3 and 6 days of skin maceration of untreated and PEF-treated grapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant differences ( P < 0.05) in the hedonic test were detected using a non‐parametric analysis achieved using Friedman's test. Results on the triangle test were analyzed according to the table of the minimum number of correct selections for a significant difference reported by Roessler et al . Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS, version 19 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of results from the triangular test obtained in each session (at the days 3 and 7) is done by comparing the number of correct identifications with the number you would expect to obtain by chance alone. In order to test this, the number of correct identifications is compared to the number expected by use of a statistical table (Roessler et al. 1948).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%