MILCOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2017.8170853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal detection effects on deep neural networks utilizing raw IQ for modulation classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The roll-off factor of the root raised cosine was varied uniformly from 0.34 to 0.36 with a step size of 0.01. For the channel model, the modulated signal was subjected to AWGN and given a center frequency offset as described by (10) to simulate errors in the receiver's signal detection stage [33] . The power of the AWGN is calculated using E s /N o and varied uniformly from 0 dB to 20 dB with a step size of 2.…”
Section: Automatic Modulation Classification Target Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The roll-off factor of the root raised cosine was varied uniformly from 0.34 to 0.36 with a step size of 0.01. For the channel model, the modulated signal was subjected to AWGN and given a center frequency offset as described by (10) to simulate errors in the receiver's signal detection stage [33] . The power of the AWGN is calculated using E s /N o and varied uniformly from 0 dB to 20 dB with a step size of 2.…”
Section: Automatic Modulation Classification Target Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One effect shown in [33] was the consequences of errors in center frequency estimation, resulting in frequency offset signals. The authors of [33] found that raw-IQ based AMC only generalized over the training distribution it was provided and therefore if additional frequency offsets outside of the training distribution were encountered, the classification accuracy would suffer. Because these estimations are never exact, adversarial examples transmitted over the air must also generalize over these effects.…”
Section: B Frequency Offsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is an integrated learning approach. Hauser et al [ 20 ] discussed how the classification performance of modulation signals is affected by sampling rate offsets and frequency offsets. This research demonstrates that training CNN over frequency and sample rate offsets does not have significant impact on performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our best of knowledge, CLDNN is widely used in voice processing involving raw time-domain signals, but its application in wireless signals is still rare. In [28], convolutional neural network was used for AMC to extract features from baseband signal samples. However, the absence of simulations of model mismatches makes this method less convincing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%