2017 First IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/irc.2017.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sign Language Learning System with Image Sampling and Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, CNN has been widely used in human behavior recognition. As a representative deep learning network, CNN has a great improvement over the traditional neural network recognition effect [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Moreover, this method is an end-to-end recognition method, which does not need to be designed manually, and is of translation invariance and scale invariance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, CNN has been widely used in human behavior recognition. As a representative deep learning network, CNN has a great improvement over the traditional neural network recognition effect [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Moreover, this method is an end-to-end recognition method, which does not need to be designed manually, and is of translation invariance and scale invariance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some research works use detection or tracking algorithms to extract the hand’s areas. Kim et al [ 30 , 31 ] used the target detection network to find the hands’ area and combined the original sign language data to feed the CNN network, which improved the accuracy and reduced the training time by half. Although traditional 2D CNN has strong feature extraction capabilities, it is not very suitable for the input of multi-frame image data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rao et al 15 created a dataset containing over 200 signs in Indian sign language, but no data augmentation was used and the dataset was limited to signs performed with one hand. Ji et al 8 classified signs performing image sampling and using grayscale, achieving an accuracy of 86%, however just 6 signs were recognized, and no further exploration was done concerning data augmentation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%