Sídelní struktury doby bronzové v oblasti Vyškovské brány

Parma, David; Holubová, Zuzana; Rybářová, Klára

doi:10.5817/sab2016-1-2

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The last excavation, caused by the construction of the cycle path, took place here in 2008. As a result of this excavation, it was possible to confirm the dating of the wall, which apparently disappeared during a military clash, as evidenced by the skeletal remains of human bodies found thrown into the ditch (Parma et al 2020;.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 85%

“…However, the massive outer wall with a moat, three hoards of numerous bronze objects, found in 1905, 1989 and 2012, and an extensive cremation burial site are later, dated to the end of the Middle Bronze Age and especially to the beginning of the Urnfield Period (Spurný 1954b). After the destruction of the fortification around 1200 BC, the site was used only sporadically, namely at the beginning of the La Tène culture (Spurný 1954a) and in the Early Medieval Period (8th century AD), when there were several agricultural estates around the former hillfort (Parma et al 2020;.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Solving Stone Age puzzles: From artefacts and sites towards archaeological interpretations

Nemergut,

Novák

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The collective monograph presents eighteen contributions from leading Central European specialists in Paleolithic archaeology, Quaternary geology, anthropology, paleoecology, and other related fields studying the Pleistocene and Holocene. Individual chapters, presenting information from new research, results of the analyses, or newly published studies, cover various areas and topics related to the interdisciplinary research of the Stone Age in Central Europe (sources of stone raw materials, the technology of artefact production, settlement and subsistence strategies, chronological relationships, and paleoecological reconstructions). Although the authors use different approaches and methods in their works, the unifying element of this colourful mosaic is the effort to show how a wide range of archaeological sources can be interpreted and explained in different ways and how they can be used for further research. In this sense, archaeological explanations and interpretations represent a fascinating and never-ending journey of learning about our past.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 85%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Solving Stone Age puzzles: From artefacts and sites towards archaeological interpretations

Nemergut,

Novák

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5). The system of waste management was similar for the entire Knoviz culture, which was characterized by a large number of sunken features and at the same time a large number of ceramic nds (Ernée 2008;Jiráň et al 2008;Parma 2015). The life of the (storage) pits was not long (Neustupný 1986) and after the loss of their primary function they were lled with waste.…”

Section: Features Groups Households and In Llsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Waste disposal processes and landfill management in Late Bronze Age inner periphery of the central Europe: Březnice settlement site (South Bohemia)

Šálková

Budilová

Kovárník

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Waste disposal processes and landfill management are crucial subjects in the field of settlement archaeology. Our study is focused on the reconstruction of the community economy in the context of the Late Bronze Age; understanding the processes that led to the filling of these features; reconstruction of the recycling system of building materials (daub and wood) and the waste management. These research questions were addressed based on plant macroremains, charcoals, phytoliths, starch, micromorphology, phosphates and magnetic volume susceptibility. The results showed the waste character of features infills which reflected specific economy and habitats around the single households. The composition of the archaeobotanical assemblages was not determined by the type of feature, however similarities in the plant spectra could often be observed in the infill of features that were located close to each other. Charred remains of firewood inside the assemblages, also contained a proportion of burnt oak structures. The remains of various parts of uncharred plants were detected by phytolith and starch analyses. Animal proteins detected the presence of livestock meat and dung. Anomalies in soil phosphate contained different amounts of organic matter in single features. Magnetic susceptibility measurements showed that the features were backfilled in a one-time event. Sedimentological analysis showed that the infills of the different types of features were similar, but only the infills of the trenches were compacted, unlike the other features.

show abstract

Research Assessment of Urnfield Culture in the North-East Part of White Carpathian Mountains in the Context of Landscape and Its Utilisation

Gašpar

2017

Acta musealia Muzea jihovýchodní Moravy ve Zlíně

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recenze Personalia a miscelanea Musealia Muzeum a škola Studie ÚvodV súčasnosti sa stávajú čoraz viac aktuálnymi úvahy o prehistorickej transhumancii -sezónnej pastve hospodárskych zvierat v pohoriach. Jednoznačne dokázať takéto praktiky v praveku je náročné aj napriek tomu, že prítomnosť človeka v pohoriach indikujú záznamy v peľových profiloch (DRESLEROVÁ 2015, s. 118-124). V tejto súvislosti sú zaujímavé Biele Karpaty, kde aktivitu vo vyšších polohách už od neolitu naznačujú druhovo pestré lúky, ktorých diverzita sa mohla vyvinúť zrejme len vďaka udržiavaniu otvorených plôch a mozaikovo-lúčnej krajine. Na rozdiel od juhozápadnej časti Bielych Karpát (HÁJKOVÁ et al. 2011, Fig. 1) pomerne komplexnú sieť osídlenia severovýchodnej časti Bielych Karpát pozorujeme až v období kultúr popolnicových polí (1300 -750 BC; obr. 1-4). Zozbierané dáta o archeologických komponentoch pochádzajú z diplomovej práce autora (GAŠPAR 2015). K problému kultúrnej genézy a vzájomným kontaktom v regióne sa vyjadril už na iných miestach (pozri: GAŠPAR v príprave A; GAŠPAR v príprave B). Tento príspevok si kladie za cieľ kriticky zhodnotiť stav bádania pre obdobie popolnicových polí (mladšia až neskorá doba bronzová) v regióne, s prihliadnutím na ľudský vplyv v krajine a jej využívanie. Za týmto účelom sú načrtnuté prírodné pomery a komplexne porovnané archeologické komponenty na moravskej

show abstract

Sídelní struktury doby bronzové v oblasti Vyškovské brány

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

Solving Stone Age puzzles: From artefacts and sites towards archaeological interpretations

Solving Stone Age puzzles: From artefacts and sites towards archaeological interpretations

Waste disposal processes and landfill management in Late Bronze Age inner periphery of the central Europe: Březnice settlement site (South Bohemia)

Research Assessment of Urnfield Culture in the North-East Part of White Carpathian Mountains in the Context of Landscape and Its Utilisation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About