2014
DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.146681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Side-effects from follicular unit extraction in hair transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may create an iatrogenic “moth-eaten” or “pseudo-syphilitic” appearance [Figure 2]. [7]Pinpoint scaring: It is a misconception that FUE is a scarproof technique. The punch used to harvest each follicular grouping may create pinpoint white atrophic macules [Figure 3].…”
Section: Complications After Fuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may create an iatrogenic “moth-eaten” or “pseudo-syphilitic” appearance [Figure 2]. [7]Pinpoint scaring: It is a misconception that FUE is a scarproof technique. The punch used to harvest each follicular grouping may create pinpoint white atrophic macules [Figure 3].…”
Section: Complications After Fuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follicular density (number of follicles/cm 2 ) is important in scouting for donor areas and assessing transplant success [ 8 ]. We evaluated the ability of the PAI technique to quantitate follicle density in various regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, FUE results in less severe scarring than FUT, and is more commonly requested by patients for this reason [ 7 ]. However, FUE is a more technically demanding procedure and has a higher risk of follicle transection; in some cases, it can also lead to cyst formation or a “moth-eaten” appearance of the donor region [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by Bernstein, the transection rate has been found to be variable . In a study by Avram using robot, a wide transection rate ranging from 0.4% to 32.1% with average 6.6%, was noted . In another study by the authors, the graft:hair ratio was found to be 1:2.3 using 0.9 mm punch…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%