The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Inklusion /Exklusion: Rhetorik, Körper, Macht 2009
DOI: 10.1515/9783110510607-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sichtbarkeit durch Unsichtbarkeit Die Rhetorik der Exklusion in der Systemtheorie Niklas Luhmanns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Luhmann’s reference to his visits to the favelas of Rio de Janeiro, exclusion becomes a central aspect in terms of a problematic social exclusion ( Luhmann , 1997: 227). By referring to Parsons’ social theory, Luhmann defines inclusion and exclusion as opportunities in which members of society are able to attend social contexts and therefore participate within them (Farzin, 2006, 2011: 80–81; Luhmann, 1995; Stichweh, 2005). Hence, social exclusion and inclusion are correlated, since the existence of inclusion inherently contains the option of exclusion (Luhmann, 1997: 620–621).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Luhmann’s reference to his visits to the favelas of Rio de Janeiro, exclusion becomes a central aspect in terms of a problematic social exclusion ( Luhmann , 1997: 227). By referring to Parsons’ social theory, Luhmann defines inclusion and exclusion as opportunities in which members of society are able to attend social contexts and therefore participate within them (Farzin, 2006, 2011: 80–81; Luhmann, 1995; Stichweh, 2005). Hence, social exclusion and inclusion are correlated, since the existence of inclusion inherently contains the option of exclusion (Luhmann, 1997: 620–621).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the effects of exclusion, the work of Michel Foucault offers a further perspective on social interaction and institutionalised contexts. Even though Foucault’s work is no theory of exclusion, he submits an analysis of exclusion by taking a differentiated look at social demarcations as well as exclusion as a regulatory tool within society (Farzin, 2011: 94; Gertenbach, 2008: 313). However, his analysis of exclusion is without question no appreciation of social inclusion: his work can be characterised by the ambivalence between his critique concerning social exclusion and discursive demarcation as well as the problematic impact on social mechanism of intrusive inclusion (Gertenbach, 2008: 314).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because these terms have been used with a normative bias, which means that inclusion is desirable and exclusion has to be avoided (Stichweh and Windolf, 2009). Farzin (2008) criticizes this by saying that in order to define what social exclusion means the term of social inclusion has been necessary. It is as if inclusion was a criterion to determine what the right or normal form of social participation is.…”
Section: The Inclusion Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Más bien es el caso contrario: existe una gran atención pública hacia los excluidos por parte de los "profesionales de la exclusión" (políticos, ONG, sociólogos, etc.). Sin embargo, esto no significa que los excluidos tengan la posibilidad de poder cambiar algo de esta situación (Farzin 2008). Para seguir el hilo de una noción analítica de exclusión con su lógica binaria, conviene centrarse, entre todos estos enfoques comunicativos, en la teoría de sistemas, pues se trata de la perspectiva que, de forma más destacada, ha desarrollado una noción binaria de inclusión y exclusión en contextos comunicativos.…”
Section: El Surgimiento Y éXito Del Concepto De Exclusión Socialunclassified