Handbook of Jealousy 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9781444323542.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sibling Rivalry in the Birds and Bees

Abstract: Families are complex social structures that are forums for often-spectacular cooperation and altruism among close kin. We find myriad examples of selfsacrificial behavior across the full spectrum of nature, from simple social insects where sisters forgo their own reproduction, and sometimes forfeit their lives to aid their close relatives, to mother hippos, bears, and crocodiles that are both fearless and lethal in the protection of their progeny. Nurturing parents and affectionate siblings match our expectati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bet-hedging strategies involve sacrificing arithmetic mean fitness to reduce variance in fitness ( Cohen, 1966 ; Donaldson-Matasci, Lachmann, and Bergstrom, 2008 ; Seger and Brockmann, 1987 ). By creating a diversified offspring portfolio, parents may reduce variance in fitness and increase geometric mean fitness ( Crean and Marshall, 2009 ; Forbes, 2009 , 2010b ). Laaksonen (2004) , for example, suggests that hatching asynchrony in birds – a maternal effect – may represent an offspring diversification strategy that yields bet-hedging benefits by inducing phenotypic variation among progeny.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bet-hedging strategies involve sacrificing arithmetic mean fitness to reduce variance in fitness ( Cohen, 1966 ; Donaldson-Matasci, Lachmann, and Bergstrom, 2008 ; Seger and Brockmann, 1987 ). By creating a diversified offspring portfolio, parents may reduce variance in fitness and increase geometric mean fitness ( Crean and Marshall, 2009 ; Forbes, 2009 , 2010b ). Laaksonen (2004) , for example, suggests that hatching asynchrony in birds – a maternal effect – may represent an offspring diversification strategy that yields bet-hedging benefits by inducing phenotypic variation among progeny.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been linked to recurrent spontaneous abortion following a first-born son ( Nielsen, 2011 ), and reduced birth weight of later-born sons ( Nielsen et al, 2008 ). Such birth order effects could serve to modulate the extent of sibling competition via maternal effects, though they could be manifestations of a cryptic sibling rivalry ( Forbes, 2010b ) that uses the mother as a conduit for “sibling effects.” The effect of birth order on traits such as sexual orientation, handedness and birth weight likely represent the tip of a phenotypic iceberg, and the current evidence suggests that they are mediated by the early prenatal environment, when synaptic connections are being established and brain circuits are highly plastic ( Champagne and Curely, 2005 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TTS-related stress responses could result from sibling rivalry, nutritional and social weaning from the mother, and /or other changes in the socioecological environment of the older offspring. In contrast to species such as rodents and birds in which sibling rivalry among same-aged litter mates can be severe or even lethal (Forbes, 2010), humans and non-human primates tend to give birth to singletons. Therefore, siblings differ in age and their dependence on mothers for food, transport, and social support, and thus, weaning status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast to species such as rodents and birds in which sibling rivalry among same-aged litter mates can be severe or even lethal (Forbes, 2010), humans and non-human primates tend to give birth to singletons. Therefore, siblings differ in age and their dependence on mothers for food, transport, and social support, and thus, weaning status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%