2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00793-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shoulder kinematics plus contextual target information enable control of multiple distal joints of a simulated prosthetic arm and hand

Abstract: Background Prosthetic restoration of reach and grasp function after a trans-humeral amputation requires control of multiple distal degrees of freedom in elbow, wrist and fingers. However, such a high level of amputation reduces the amount of available myoelectric and kinematic information from the residual limb. Methods To overcome these limits, we added contextual information about the target’s location and orientation such as can now be extracted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might lead to suboptimal grip forces applied to the objects, which could be ameliorated via a soft-synergy approach with mass-dependent variable gains 54 , or through a grasped object slip prevention algorithm 55 . Additionally, techniques to automate the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints could be highly beneficial to reduce the cognitive burden on the amputee to multitask by sensing upper body compensatory motions 56 or shoulder kinematics with respect to the grasped object locations 57 to autonomously plan smooth prosthetic arm trajectories. These types of motion planning algorithms could reduce unnecessary oscillations in grip forces and corresponding haptic sensations during object transportation 58 while reflexive compensation for inertial loads during transport could be used to proactively prevent slip of the grasped objects 59 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might lead to suboptimal grip forces applied to the objects, which could be ameliorated via a soft-synergy approach with mass-dependent variable gains 54 , or through a grasped object slip prevention algorithm 55 . Additionally, techniques to automate the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints could be highly beneficial to reduce the cognitive burden on the amputee to multitask by sensing upper body compensatory motions 56 or shoulder kinematics with respect to the grasped object locations 57 to autonomously plan smooth prosthetic arm trajectories. These types of motion planning algorithms could reduce unnecessary oscillations in grip forces and corresponding haptic sensations during object transportation 58 while reflexive compensation for inertial loads during transport could be used to proactively prevent slip of the grasped objects 59 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the shoulder is the closest part of the upper limb to the trunk of the body, it may indeed be functional even in people with upper-limb disabilities. In addition, the shoulder is a part of the body that is expected to be applied as an interface for prosthetic hands, and there is a high possibility that signals useful for estimation can be read (5) .…”
Section: Determination Of Body Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite great progress in upper limb bionic prostheses, allowing for object-of-interest reaching and grasping, the key remaining issues relate to their control by the operator. To overcome the limitations of traditional control solely based on the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the remaining muscles, promising alternatives consider hybrid systems combining noninvasive motion capture and vision control [1,2]. They include camera vision modules that allow for recognition of the subject's intention to grasp an object and assist visual control of prosthetic arms for object reaching and grasping [3].…”
Section: Introduction and State-of-the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time performance is also a mandatory requirement for our target application [2,7]. As the fastest visuomotor response to a perturbation takes about 90 ms [8], and feedback delays of 100 ms or more are known to deteriorate the performance of online feedback control [9], computation time should remain as low as possible, and below 100 ms.…”
Section: Introduction and State-of-the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%