2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215106002118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should we aspirate middle-ear effusions prior to insertion of ventilation tubes?

Abstract: Seven studies were identified, of which three fitted the inclusion criteria of our review. Current evidence suggests that aspiration of middle-ear effusions prior to insertion of ventilation tubes is not associated with any improvement in clinical outcome, in terms of post-operative hearing levels, otorrhoea or rates of blockage of ventilation tubes. Significantly increased rates of tympanosclerosis were observed in one study and the development of acoustic trauma was observed; however, no significant associat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For in‐office patients, otorrhea (6.0%) or tube occlusion (3.1%) rate by ear within the first month after the procedure was similar to rates reported in the literature, despite infrequent suction of effusion. This result is consistent with the literature suggesting that suction is not necessary to ensure a patent tube or reduce otorrhea rate . Resolution of effusion and tube patency rates at the 3‐week follow‐up were similar for ears that had serous or mucoid effusions at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For in‐office patients, otorrhea (6.0%) or tube occlusion (3.1%) rate by ear within the first month after the procedure was similar to rates reported in the literature, despite infrequent suction of effusion. This result is consistent with the literature suggesting that suction is not necessary to ensure a patent tube or reduce otorrhea rate . Resolution of effusion and tube patency rates at the 3‐week follow‐up were similar for ears that had serous or mucoid effusions at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It was not possible to verify any association between the development of myringosclerosis and the presence and the type of effusion (mucous or serous); the intra-operative hemorrhage (as described by Spree et al [23] and Parker et al [16]); the myringotomy incision orientation or the middle ear aspiration (discordant with the conclusions of Liana et al [24]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…B. Sichelmesser) oder als laserassistierte Myringotomie durchgeführt. Danach ist das Sekret aus der Paukenhöhle abzusaugen [15]. Bei saniertem Epipharynx und bei dünnflüs-sigem Paukensekret nach Parazentese ist davon auszugehen, dass eine weitere Sekretdrainage über den natürlichen Weg der Tuba auditiva erfolgen kann und eine zusätzliche Paukenröhrcheneinlage häufig nicht notwendig ist.…”
Section: Operativunclassified