2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should atypia of undetermined significance be subclassified to better estimate risk of thyroid cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will justify the continued surveillance in patients who otherwise do not have an indication for surgical intervention. Similar conclusions were made by Broome et al 4 and Chen et al 6 The latter authors advised to repeat FNAB after 3 to 6 months, and if the repeated biopsy is nondiagnostic or again interpreted as AUS/FLUS, then surgery is indicated. On the contrary, some authors observed that no difference in malignancy rate between one and repeated FNABs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This will justify the continued surveillance in patients who otherwise do not have an indication for surgical intervention. Similar conclusions were made by Broome et al 4 and Chen et al 6 The latter authors advised to repeat FNAB after 3 to 6 months, and if the repeated biopsy is nondiagnostic or again interpreted as AUS/FLUS, then surgery is indicated. On the contrary, some authors observed that no difference in malignancy rate between one and repeated FNABs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) has six categories, one of which is AUS or FLUS, which is a heterogeneous group that is difficult to classify as benign, follicular neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy, or malignant. [1][2][3][4][5][6] In AUS/FLUS, the risk of malignancy in resected nodules is 5 to 15%, but a variation from 6 to 48% is in record. [6][7][8][9] It has been reported that with repeated FNAB in AUS/ FLUS cases, about 56 to 68% will have a more definitive result and 15.6 to 48.6% will be interpreted as AUS/FLUS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malignancy rates that were reported by first group studies, including all undetermined patients for follow-up, are found between 15.7% and 44.1% (Horne Dincer et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2014;Ho et al, 2014;Hyeon et al, 2014;Rosario, 2014). In contrast, these rates are reported between 22.8% and 54% in the second group of studies that have only selected the patients who underwent surgery (Alexander et al, 2012;Jeong et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2014;Cuhaci et al, 2014;Ho et al, 2014;Park et al, 2014;Ryu et al, 2014). In our study, as a consequence of our patient selection, there is a predictable selection bias, caused by including the patients who only underwent thyroidectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This could be accomplished using a concise note, Common patterns that would be candidates for subclassifiers include: architectural atypia, nuclear atypia, oncocytic features, and NOS. Several studies have demonstrated that subclassification within the AUS/FLUS category can be effective to better define the ROM, and that nuclear atypia is associated with a higher ROM than other AUS/FLUS patterns [23,24,25,26,27,28]. …”
Section: Specific Issues Pertaining To the Different Diagnostic Categmentioning
confidence: 99%