2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shot scale matters: The effect of close-up frequency on mental state attribution in film viewers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because media have form, one can tease apart how they engage audiences in particular tasks, what those tasks are and how specific elements of that form influence the biological processes and psychological experience of viewers in a predictable and therefore useful way for scientific study. Close-ups effectively engage social processes such as empathy ( Bálint et al. , 2020 ; Lankhuizen et al.…”
Section: A Media Primer For Naturalistic Neurosciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because media have form, one can tease apart how they engage audiences in particular tasks, what those tasks are and how specific elements of that form influence the biological processes and psychological experience of viewers in a predictable and therefore useful way for scientific study. Close-ups effectively engage social processes such as empathy ( Bálint et al. , 2020 ; Lankhuizen et al.…”
Section: A Media Primer For Naturalistic Neurosciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camera distance , also called shot type, is typically defined in relation to a human subject, and ranges from extreme close-up to close-up, medium close-up, medium shot, medium-long shot, long shot, and extreme long shot (Bordwell et al, 2016). Experimental research has shown that closer shots facilitate elaboration about the mental life of the subject (Bálint et al, 2020) and polarize affective perception, emphasizing either the negativity or the positivity of the impression (Mutz, 2007; Reeves et al, 1992). However, a closer look at the literature suggests complex effects when message content is considered.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true for camera angle studies, where stimuli range from monologues, lectures, or newscasts (Avery & Long, 1976; Baranowski & Hecht, 2018; Mandell & Shaw, 1973; Reeves et al, 1992; Tiemens, 1970), to representations of everyday events (Kraft, 1987; Sevenants & d’Ydewalle, 2006), and images of objects (Meyers-Levy & Peracchio, 1992). Although some studies on camera distance have used more emotionally complex stimuli (Bálint et al, 2020; Canini et al, 2011; Mutz, 2007), they have typically used few or single message designs, with the exception of Canini et al (2011), who did include messages from a larger emotional spectrum but found a reversed relationship between closeness and emotional arousal. Although previous research has used emotionally neutral stimuli, there is no theoretical reason to doubt that camera distance and camera angle effects should also occur for pictures covering a large emotional and content range, while it is possible that some differences could manifest.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of shot scale lies in the fact that, among cinematic techniques which are relevant to viewers’ responses [2] , it affects both low- and high-complexity responses in viewers, with a strong potential to influence how fictional narratives are processed and experienced [3] , [4] , [5] . Recent findings indicate that the shot scale impacts viewers’ responses related to character engagement, such as theory of mind [6] , [7] , [8] emotion recognition [9] , and empathic care [10] . Shot scale assessment has been systematically related to viewers’ rating on film mood and narrative engagement [11] .…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%