1998
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-28-3-402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term effect of restoration on vegetation change and methane emissions from peatlands drained for forestry in southern Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
39
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drainage of peatlands reduces the emissions, because emerging aerobic conditions suppress the activity of methanogens (Kettunen et al 1999, Freeman et al 2002, while concurrently, methanotrophs are not affected much (Roulet et al 1993, Sundh et al 1994. The aerobic conditions also lead to enhanced decomposition rates, which is associated with a decrease in the amount of substrate available for CH 4 production (Komulainen et al 1998, Huttunen et al 2003b, Basiliko et al 2007, Eriksson et al 2010.…”
Section: Ch 4 Emissions From Peatland Buffer Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drainage of peatlands reduces the emissions, because emerging aerobic conditions suppress the activity of methanogens (Kettunen et al 1999, Freeman et al 2002, while concurrently, methanotrophs are not affected much (Roulet et al 1993, Sundh et al 1994. The aerobic conditions also lead to enhanced decomposition rates, which is associated with a decrease in the amount of substrate available for CH 4 production (Komulainen et al 1998, Huttunen et al 2003b, Basiliko et al 2007, Eriksson et al 2010.…”
Section: Ch 4 Emissions From Peatland Buffer Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a successful rewetting carbon cycle typical for mire ecosystem is slowly revitalized. However, the few studies that have assessed CH 4 emissions on restored peatlands indicate that although restoration increases the emissions (Tuittila et al 2000, Waddington andDay 2007) they remain lower than for pristine mires, at least during the first two-three years after restoration (Komulainen et al 1998, Tuittila et al 2000. The reason for the low rate of CH 4 release after rewetting is not fully understood, however, one reason could be the very slow re-establishment of methanogenic bacteria after prolonged aeration (Tuittila et al 2000).…”
Section: Ch 4 Emissions From Peatland Buffer Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and other forest mosses. Vegetation changes after drainage are described in more detail by Laine et al (1995a), and after restoration by Komulainen et al (1998). Tree stand volumes were 6, 11, 76 and 278 m 3 ha -1 for the undrained site and the 12, 26 and 60 year-old drained sites, respectively (Laiho, 1997).…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sites were selected on the basis of extensive earlier studies (e.g. Laiho, 1997;Komulainen et al, 1998) to ensure comparability of sites as much as possible. Five peatland sites were sampled: a pristine undrained tall-sedge pine fen site, comparable sites drained for forestry 12, 26 and ca.…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, peatland research has strongly focused on boreal and temperate peats, with important knowledge developments in aspects such as peatland function and characteristics (see for example Heikurainen & Päivänen, 1970;Hogg et al 1992;Bonnett et al 2006), and management techniques for restoration and rehabilitation (see Komulainen et al 1998;Shantz & Price 2006;Worrall et al 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%