2016
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-016-0605-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term diagnostic stability of probable headache disorders based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition beta version, in first-visit patients: a multicenter follow-up study

Abstract: BackgroundA “Probable headache disorder” is diagnosed when a patient’s headache fulfills all but one criterion of a headache disorder in the 3rd beta edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorder (ICHD-3β). We investigated diagnostic changes in probable headache disorders in first-visit patients after at least 3 months of follow-up.MethodsThis was a longitudinal study using a prospective headache registry from nine headache clinics of referral hospitals. The diagnostic change of probable hea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research design may help to strengthen the diagnosis of patients with probable CH. The previous longitudinal follow-up study investigated the diagnostic stability of all probable diagnoses using the multicenter headache registry ( 15 ). The initial probable headache diagnosis remained unchanged in three-quarters of the patients, with a median follow-up period of 6.5 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This research design may help to strengthen the diagnosis of patients with probable CH. The previous longitudinal follow-up study investigated the diagnostic stability of all probable diagnoses using the multicenter headache registry ( 15 ). The initial probable headache diagnosis remained unchanged in three-quarters of the patients, with a median follow-up period of 6.5 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of unmet criteria, the prevalence of diagnostic stability was lower in subgroups lacking data on time-based criteria, such as number of attacks or total headache period. This lack of data was particularly evident among migraine and tension type headache patients due to the fact that a larger proportion of these patients than of other subgroups of patients progress to a definite diagnosis ( 15 ). In our study, the most common unmet criteria were symptom-based, which may be related to atypical presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that the classification of a patient in a given PH subtype may change in a quarter of cases, especially when the diagnosis is probable, even in expert centers [40]. Patients suffering from chronic migraine frequently report other types of pain (i.e., fibromyalgia), and both types of pain are usually more or less refractory to common treatments [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Headache is the fundamental symptom for a diagnosis of acute mountain sickness (AMS) according to the Lake Louise Scoring System (Imray et al, 2010 ; Bartsch and Swenson, 2013 ; Davis and Hackett, 2017 ). In this context, high-altitude headache (HAH) is a defined and recognized headache disorder, which occurs within 24 h after ascending to an altitude of >2,500 m, based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3β criteria (Marmura and Hernandez, 2015 ; Kim et al, 2016 ). Approximately 80% of people are thought to experience headache after rapidly ascending to high altitudes, which is associated with disturbances in their daily life and work that create an important public health problem (Carod-Artal, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%