Short-term cortical plasticity induced by conditioning pain modulation

Abstract

To investigate the effects of homotopic and heterotopic conditioning pain modulation (CPM) on short-term cortical plasticity. Glutamate (tonic pain) or isotonic saline (sham) was injected in the upper trapezius (homotopic) and in the thenar (heterotopic) muscles. Intramuscular electrical stimulation was applied to the trapezius at pain threshold intensities, and somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded with 128 channel EEG. Pain ratings were obtained during glutamate and sham pain injection. Short-term cortical plasticity to electrical stimulation was investigated before, during, and after homotopic and heterotopic CPM versus control. Peak latencies at N100, P200, and P300 were extracted and the location/strength of corresponding dipole current sources and multiple dipoles were estimated. Homotopic CPM caused hypoalgesia (P = 0.032, 30.6% compared to baseline) to electrical stimulation. No cortical changes were found for homotopic CPM. A positive correlation at P200 between electrical pain threshold after tonic pain and the z coordinate after tonic pain (P = 0.032) was found for homotopic CPM. For heterotopic CPM, no significant hypoalgesia was found and a dipole shift of the P300 z coordinate (P = 0.001) was found between glutamate versus sham pain (P = 0.009). This generator was located in the cingulate. A positive correlation at P300 between pain ratings to glutamate injection and the x coordinate during tonic pain (P = 0.016) was found for heterotopic CPM. Heterotopic CPM caused short-term cortical plasticity within the cingulate that was correlated to subjective pain ratings. The degree of long-term depressive effect to homotopic CPM was correlated to the change in location of the P200 dipole.

Pain catastrophizing and cortical responses in amputees with varying levels of phantom limb pain: a high-density EEG brain-mapping study

“…As the responses to the tests are not independent, the alpha value is not adjusted. This approach is in agreement with previous studies within the field (Vase et al 2011;Egsgaard et al 2012).…”

More than a feeling: scalp EEG and eye correlates of conscious tactile perception

“…Indeed, the interpretation of what the P300 represents hinges partially on whether it is a marker of consciousness or a result of report. To remove the potential confounds of using either differential stimuli (such as masks), recent work has explored eye metrics as a covert measure of perception that may open the door for the development of no-report paradigms (Babiloni et al, 2001;Cohen et al, 2020;Derda et al, 2019;Donchin & Coles, 1988;Egsgaard et al, 2012;Koivisto, Grassini, Salminen-Vaparanta, & Revonsuo, 2017;Koivisto et al, 2016;Muñoz et al, 2014;Pitts, Metzler, et al, 2014;Pitts, Padwal, et al, 2014;Polich, 2007;Railo et al, 2011;Truini et al, 2004).…”

“…Although there are several conflicting theories about what gives rise to consciousness itself, studies spanning recording techniques and behavioral paradigms find characteristic activity in sensory areas followed by widespread activity in higher-level associative cortical regions, including frontal and parietal cortices. Studies on visual perception have dominated the field, and although auditory perceptual studies have made inroads, the number of studies examining other senses, including tactile (Eimer, Forster, & Van Velzen, 2003;Kida, Wasaka, Nakata, Akatsuka, & Kakigi, 2006;Schubert, Blankenburg, Lemm, Villringer, & Curio, 2006) and olfaction (Abbasi et al, 2020;Kim, Bae, Jin, & Moon, 2020) still lags far behind; though, notably, there is an extensive literature on pain perception that stands somewhat apart (Babiloni et al, 2001;Buchgreitz, Egsgaard, Jensen, Arendt-Nielsen, & Bendtsen, 2008;Douros, Karrer, & Rosenfeld, 1994;Egsgaard et al, 2012;McDowell et al, 2006;Truini et al, 2004). An expanded and rigorous study of the neural basis of consciousness across all sensory modalities is necessary to truly understand whether there are common mechanisms of conscious perception.…”

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and conditioned pain modulation influence the perception of pain in humans

“…Research in animal models suggests that TENS and CPM both produce analgesia at the level of the spinal cord via two different supraspinal pathways: rostral ventral medulla (RVM)/periaqueductal grey (PAG) in the midbrain and medullary reticularis nucleus dorsalis (MdD) in the medulla, respectively (Bouhassira et al., ; Villanueva et al., ; Kalra et al., ; Sluka and Walsh, ; Desantana et al., ; Villanueva, ; de Resende et al., ). Both pathways converge at the level of the spinal cord using similar inhibitory neurotransmitters, but may also be activated by similar cortical sites such as the cingulate cortex (Egsgaard et al., ; Kocyigit et al., ). As CPM is generally used to measure the integrity of endogenous inhibition, and TENS uses endogenous inhibition to produce analgesia, CPM may also be a useful clinical tool to predict the effectiveness of TENS.…”