2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-012-1138-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short pain-provoked head-up tilt test for the confirmation of vasovagal syncope

Abstract: We investigated a short pain-provoked head-up tilt (PP-HUT) and the Calgary Syncope Symptom Score in a group of patients with clinically diagnosed vasovagal syncope and group of neurological patients without transient loss of consciousness. We included 127 consecutive patients who were investigated in our laboratory. The group 1 included 56 patients who after appropriate investigations were diagnosed with vasovagal syncope. The group 2 included 70 neurological patients without transient loss of consciousness. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients diagnosed with RRMS who signed informed consent had a head-up tilt table test (HUTT) performed on them according to the standard protocol before application of corticosteroid therapy [9]. HUTT is conducted in two phases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients diagnosed with RRMS who signed informed consent had a head-up tilt table test (HUTT) performed on them according to the standard protocol before application of corticosteroid therapy [9]. HUTT is conducted in two phases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adamec et al . used a painful stimulus (insertion of a needle into the subcutis of the dorsum of the hand for 30 s) after 10 min of HUT to evoke VVS. They reported a sensitivity of 65.9%, but did not discriminate between patients with a positive or negative history for VP induced VVS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PP-HUTT was performed as previously described (Adamec et al 2012). Patients were divided into two groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%