2016
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2016141-7939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Communication: Soil carbon pools in different pasture systems

Abstract: <p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The aim of this study was to assess the carbon pools of a tropical soil where the native forest was replaced with different pasture systems. We studied five pasture production systems, including four monoculture systems with forage grasses such as <em>Andropogon</em>, <em>Brachiaria</em>, <em>Panicum</em>, and <em>Cynodon</em>, and an agroforestry system as well as a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PAST SCS 30 estimate (28.0 Mg-C ha −1 ± 11.4 Mg-C ha −1 ) is similar to estimates by [ 61 ], which found 28.87 Mg-C ha −1 ± 9.23 Mg-C ha −1 for a managed pasture in a sandy soil, which is higher than values collected at degraded pasture areas (23.87 Mg-C ha -1 ± 5.67 Mg-C ha -1 ). The use of soil samples collected in different types of forage grasses (such as Brachiaria , Panicum , and Andropogon ) and the choice of sampling seasons used to estimate SCS 100 in PAST are among the factors affecting the soil C estimates [ 62 ]. For example, during the dry season, all these forage grass systems have lower amounts of soil C (0− 20 cm) when compared with the wet season, and different grasses have different strategies for partitioning carbon content into high- and low-lability soil carbon fractions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PAST SCS 30 estimate (28.0 Mg-C ha −1 ± 11.4 Mg-C ha −1 ) is similar to estimates by [ 61 ], which found 28.87 Mg-C ha −1 ± 9.23 Mg-C ha −1 for a managed pasture in a sandy soil, which is higher than values collected at degraded pasture areas (23.87 Mg-C ha -1 ± 5.67 Mg-C ha -1 ). The use of soil samples collected in different types of forage grasses (such as Brachiaria , Panicum , and Andropogon ) and the choice of sampling seasons used to estimate SCS 100 in PAST are among the factors affecting the soil C estimates [ 62 ]. For example, during the dry season, all these forage grass systems have lower amounts of soil C (0− 20 cm) when compared with the wet season, and different grasses have different strategies for partitioning carbon content into high- and low-lability soil carbon fractions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the intrinsic physical and structural characteristics of sandy soils, it is important to monitor C stocks over time and to evaluate the resilience of accumulated C estimates. Crop rotation, no-tillage [ 6 , 67 ], reduced tillage, irrigation, increased belowground inputs [ 15 ], and forage grass type [ 62 ] are factors that affect C accumulation in the long term. However, it remains to be determined whether this behavior is also observed in sandy Cerrado soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%