2014
DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2014.951315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short apraxia screening test

Abstract: The screening test proved to have high specificity and sensitivity to diagnose every type of upper limb praxis deficit, thus showing advantages over previously published tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To aid the clinical evaluation of apraxia, several short screening tools appropriate for bedside testing have been developed, including the Apraxia Screen of the Test of Upper Limb Apraxia (TULIA) and the Short Test for Apraxia (202,203). More comprehensive batteries can be considered as well, including the Tool for Oral and Limb Apraxia, the De Renzi Ideomotor Apraxia Test, the complete TULIA, and the Florida Apraxia Battery (204)(205)(206)(207).…”
Section: Limb Apraxiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To aid the clinical evaluation of apraxia, several short screening tools appropriate for bedside testing have been developed, including the Apraxia Screen of the Test of Upper Limb Apraxia (TULIA) and the Short Test for Apraxia (202,203). More comprehensive batteries can be considered as well, including the Tool for Oral and Limb Apraxia, the De Renzi Ideomotor Apraxia Test, the complete TULIA, and the Florida Apraxia Battery (204)(205)(206)(207).…”
Section: Limb Apraxiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 - 8 Considering this, few studies have been carried out to specifically examine the influence of demographic variables on praxis skills, although there is recent research related to limb apraxia assessment. 9 , 10 Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of individuals without neurological injury on a limb apraxia battery and to determine the influence of gender, age, and education on the assessed praxis skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existen otros test menos utilizados en España como los alemanes Diagnostic Instrument for Limb Apraxia (DILA), su versión reducida (DILA-S) 23 y el Köllner Apraxie Screening (KAS), 24 el italiano Short Test for Ideo-Motor Apraxia (STIMA), [25][26] el argentino Short Apraxia Screening Test (SAST), 27 los franceses en la Batería de Evaluación de la Praxia (BEP) y su versión reducida (BREP), 28 o los australo-americanos de la Florida Apraxia Battery-Extended and Revised Sydney (FABERS) y la Florida Apraxia Battery (FAB). 29 Todas estas pruebas logran una aproximación al diagnóstico clínico de la apraxia, pero también presentan algunas limitaciones útiles para la práctica clínica, al no valorar el uso de objetos, gestos reales vs no reales, gestos proximales vs distales, transitivos vs intransitivos, reflexivos vs no reflexivos, con significado vs sin significado, problemas mecánicos, secuencias, disociaciones pantomima-uso del objeto, la apraxia voluntaria vs automática, etc.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified