2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short- and long-term responses of riparian cottonwoods (Populus spp.) to flow diversion: Analysis of tree-ring radial growth and stable carbon isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, stable carbon isotope discrimination (∆ 13 C) in tree‐rings records the canopy‐integrated ratio of photosynthetic assimilation to stomatal conductance (Ehleringer et al, 1993; Farquhar et al, 1989; McCarroll & Loader, 2004), making it a promising EWS candidate. In forests of the western United States, ∆ 13 C has been used extensively to understand various aspects of past drought stress due to the dominant impact of stomatal closure on this signal (Keen et al, 2020; Leavitt et al, 2011; Roden & Ehleringer, 2007; Schook et al, 2020; Szejner et al, 2016; Voelker et al, 2019). Both ring width and ∆ 13 C records offer insight into differing dimensions of drought stress that may be important for recognizing novel EWS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, stable carbon isotope discrimination (∆ 13 C) in tree‐rings records the canopy‐integrated ratio of photosynthetic assimilation to stomatal conductance (Ehleringer et al, 1993; Farquhar et al, 1989; McCarroll & Loader, 2004), making it a promising EWS candidate. In forests of the western United States, ∆ 13 C has been used extensively to understand various aspects of past drought stress due to the dominant impact of stomatal closure on this signal (Keen et al, 2020; Leavitt et al, 2011; Roden & Ehleringer, 2007; Schook et al, 2020; Szejner et al, 2016; Voelker et al, 2019). Both ring width and ∆ 13 C records offer insight into differing dimensions of drought stress that may be important for recognizing novel EWS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial DW decline beginning in the 1960s is interpreted as being due to drought stress, while at RU, competition for light associated with a successional transition to white fir‐dominated forest is a likely cause (Table 1). Higher drought stress at DW compared to RU has been demonstrated by higher stable carbon isotope ratios beginning abruptly in 1961, stronger correlation between BAI and stable carbon isotope ratios, stronger correlations relating tree‐ring metrics to precipitation and flow, higher branch mortality and lower canopy vigour (Schook et al, 2020). Here, we add that the DW reach also had higher tree mortality (Figure 10) and fragmentation of the forest canopy (Figure 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical forest management practices appear to have caused the tree‐ring narrowing at RU. Nearly all of the RU cottonwoods established from 1876 to 1899 (Schook et al, 2020) after timber harvests opened the forest canopy. Conifers have since regrown and now shade out cottonwoods, providing an alternate mechanism for tree‐ring narrowing (Cailleret et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations