2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-010-0073-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short- and Long-Term Earthquake Forecasts for California and Nevada

Abstract: Abstract-We present estimates of future earthquake rate density (probability per unit area, time, and magnitude) on a 0.1-degree grid for a region including California and Nevada, based only on data from past earthquakes. Our long-term forecast is not explicitly time-dependent, but it can be updated at any time to incorporate information from recent earthquakes. The present version, founded on several decades worth of data, is suitable for testing without updating over a five-year period as part of the experim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within both the M ≥ 2 and the M ≥ 3 forecast group, K 3 achieved the highest gain, followed by the ensemble model and ETAS. According to the T-and W-tests, all three models currently achieve significantly larger gains than any other model, including the STEP model by Gerstenberger et al (2005) and the critical-branching model by Kagan and Jackson (2010). Accumulating target earthquakes will enable more meaningful distinctions between the information content of the forecasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within both the M ≥ 2 and the M ≥ 3 forecast group, K 3 achieved the highest gain, followed by the ensemble model and ETAS. According to the T-and W-tests, all three models currently achieve significantly larger gains than any other model, including the STEP model by Gerstenberger et al (2005) and the critical-branching model by Kagan and Jackson (2010). Accumulating target earthquakes will enable more meaningful distinctions between the information content of the forecasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The body wave magnitude ( m b ) and surface wave magnitudes ( M s ) can be analytically converted to M w . However, Kagan [] found inconclusive results, and Kagan and Jackson [] used maximum magnitude for long and short term earthquake forecast in California and Nevada. We also use maximum magnitude without converting m b / M s to M w for this study.…”
Section: Data: Catalog Homogeneity and Completenessmentioning
confidence: 99%