2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgrb.50068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non‐stationary epidemic type aftershock sequence model for seismicity prior to the December 26, 2004 M 9.1 Sumatra‐Andaman Islands mega‐earthquake

Abstract: .[1] We study temporal changes in seismicity in Sumatra-Andaman Islands region before the M 9.1 earthquake of December 26, 2004. We applied the epidemic type aftershock sequence (ETAS) models to the seismicity. The two-stage non-stationary ETAS model with a single change-point provides a better statistical fit to the seismicity data than the stationary ETAS model throughout the whole period. We made further change-point analysis of data sets by dividing into two sub-regions. The best fitted models suggest that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If AIC 12 is smaller, the two-stage ETAS model with the change point T 0 fits better than the ETAS model applied to the whole interval. The quantity q monotonically depends on sample size (number of earthquakes in the whole period [S, T ]) when searching for the maximum likelihood estimate of the change point [Ogata (1992[Ogata ( , 1999, Kumazawa, Ogata and Toda (2010), Bansal and Ogata (2013)]. This penalty term q, as well as an increased number of estimated parameters, imposes a hurdle for a change point to be significant, and it is usually rejected when the one-stage ETAS model fits sufficiently well.…”
Section: Theoretical Cumulative Intensity Function and Time Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If AIC 12 is smaller, the two-stage ETAS model with the change point T 0 fits better than the ETAS model applied to the whole interval. The quantity q monotonically depends on sample size (number of earthquakes in the whole period [S, T ]) when searching for the maximum likelihood estimate of the change point [Ogata (1992[Ogata ( , 1999, Kumazawa, Ogata and Toda (2010), Bansal and Ogata (2013)]. This penalty term q, as well as an increased number of estimated parameters, imposes a hurdle for a change point to be significant, and it is usually rejected when the one-stage ETAS model fits sufficiently well.…”
Section: Theoretical Cumulative Intensity Function and Time Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some evidence for strain accumulation has been suggested based on a single measurement of Global Positioning System (GPS) velocity (Paul et al, 2001) and the available earthquake data from the global catalog (Nuannin et al, 2005;Bansal and Ogata, 2013). Here, we present the evidence of strain accumulation in the Andaman region from GPS and tide gauge measurements made prior to the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, the b value decreased significantly in the earthquake nucleation zone in the Sumatra and in the North Andaman region (Nuannin et al, 2005) in the two years preceding the 2004 earthquake. Bansal and Ogata (2013) identified a general increase in background seismicity rate, which commenced in July 2000 in the epicentral region. GPS Measurements Prior to the 2004 Earthquake GPS measurements in the Sumatra region began in 1991 (Prawirodirdjo et al, 1997;Bock et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With this criterion, the model with a smaller value of the AIC is expected to perform better prediction. The difference in the AIC values, ΔAIC, between the two competing models is useful, because exp{− ΔAIC/2} can be interpreted as the relative probability of how the model with the smaller AIC value is superior to the other, see the selected papers of Akaike (Parzen et al 1998 or maximize the likelihood (e.g., Bansal and Ogata 2013) with respect to the change-point candidate parameter T 0 , which can be called the MLE of the change-point with respect to the time.…”
Section: Statistical Models To Monitor Aftershock Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%