2020
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short and long interpregnancy interval and the risk for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea in the offspring

Abstract: Introduction Interpregnancy interval (IPI) is defined as the period between a live birth and the conception of a subsequent fetus. Both short (IPI < 6 months) and long IPI (IPI > 60 months) have been shown to increase the risk for adverse perinatal outcomes, some of which, are known risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in the offspring. Aims To study the association between IPI and risk for offspring OSAS, during a follow‐up period of up to 18 years. Study design Population‐based cohort. Su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Tan et al reported that children whose mothers were exposed to smoke during pregnancy had a 2.6-fold increase in their risk of developing OSAS [50]. Rapaport Pasternak et al have also reported similar results [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Additionally, Tan et al reported that children whose mothers were exposed to smoke during pregnancy had a 2.6-fold increase in their risk of developing OSAS [50]. Rapaport Pasternak et al have also reported similar results [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Both short and long IDIs appear to be associated with increased risks of adverse maternalfetal outcomes, including preterm delivery (24), small-forgestational-age birth (25), and infant mortality (26)(27)(28)(29). Clinical postpartum practice and public health guidelines recommend an IDI of at least 18 to 24 months and no more than 60 months (19,(30)(31)(32). However, in relation to postpartum pelvic floor disorders in women, there is a lack of evidence to support the views expressed in the guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%