Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003287.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
96
0
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
4
96
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and 2). The main advantages of short acting insulin analogues compared to regular insulin are a faster onset of action and shorter duration time leading to a reduced risk for hypoglycaemia [6,7]. The long-acting insulin analogues, insulin glargine and insulin detemir, reveal some advantages compared to NPH-Insulin, such as their availability in clear solution, the longer duration of action and absence of a significant peak resulting in a decreased rate of hypoglycaemic events and nocturnal hypoglycaemia [8][9][10].…”
Section: Insulin Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and 2). The main advantages of short acting insulin analogues compared to regular insulin are a faster onset of action and shorter duration time leading to a reduced risk for hypoglycaemia [6,7]. The long-acting insulin analogues, insulin glargine and insulin detemir, reveal some advantages compared to NPH-Insulin, such as their availability in clear solution, the longer duration of action and absence of a significant peak resulting in a decreased rate of hypoglycaemic events and nocturnal hypoglycaemia [8][9][10].…”
Section: Insulin Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When five sensitivity analyses were performed using a range of HbA 1c reductions for BIAsp30 (from the -1.82%-points reduction observed in PRESENT, to the 0% reduction calculated in a Cochrane review of randomised clinical trials of insulin analogues 26 ( Figure 3). When no reduction in HbA 1c was simulated for BIAsp30, an ICER of CNY 22,681 per QALY gained was calculated.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25 Furthermore, a recent Cochrane review of short-acting insulin analogues revealed a trend towards significant reductions in hypoglycaemic events (on average -0.2 episodes per patient per month [95% CI: -0.5, 0.1]) versus human insulins in type 2 diabetes. 26 The Physicians' Routine Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of NovoMix 30 Therapy (PRESENT) study was an open-label, multicountry, single-arm, observational study that enrolled over 20,000 patients with type 2 diabetes, both insulin-naïve and insulintreated, with and without concurrent OAD usage, and has been reported extensively elsewhere. [27][28][29][30] Patients in PRESENT were treated with BIAsp30 twice-daily at dosages that varied according to the discretion of their physician and were not treated to any specific glycaemic control targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Als Beispiel für eine früher publizierte Metaanalyse zu Hypoglykämien seien Brunelle BL et al [5] erwähnt, die zum Schluss kommen: "The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that in type 1 diabetic patients, the frequency of severe hypoglycemia can be reduced by taking insulin lispro as compared with regular human insulin therapy." V. Kürzlich ist eine Cochrane-Analyse zu diesem Thema erschienen: Short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus [12]. Die Autoren kommen zu dem Schluss: "Our analysis suggests only a minor benefit of short acting insulin analogues in the majority of diabetic patients treated with insulin."…”
Section: Die Canadian Diabetes Associationunclassified