2015
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azv007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shopping for Free? Looting, Consumerism and the 2011 Riots: Fig. 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not to deny that attacks on the police opened the way to 'consumerist' looting. But even here we agree with Newburn et al (2015) that at times there appears to have been political dimensions to such behaviour in terms of what was looted, how it was looted and how some looting may have been a reflection on policecommunity relations. Nonetheless, our analysis is limited because it is isolated to precipitating events and we have yet to explore the explanatory power of a social identity approach with regard to the 'contagion' of the rioting beyond Tottenham.…”
Section: Points Of Significancesupporting
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is not to deny that attacks on the police opened the way to 'consumerist' looting. But even here we agree with Newburn et al (2015) that at times there appears to have been political dimensions to such behaviour in terms of what was looted, how it was looted and how some looting may have been a reflection on policecommunity relations. Nonetheless, our analysis is limited because it is isolated to precipitating events and we have yet to explore the explanatory power of a social identity approach with regard to the 'contagion' of the rioting beyond Tottenham.…”
Section: Points Of Significancesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Consequently, the most abundant data source is post hoc accounts, which predominate in the literature (e.g. Guardian/LSE, 2011;Newburn et al, 2015;Treadwell et al, 2013). It is easy to dismiss such accounts on epistemological grounds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations