1986 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 1986
DOI: 10.1109/aps.1986.1149823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shooting and bouncing rays: Calculating RCS of an arbitrary cavity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to now, in the open literature many cavity scattering problems have been analysed by using a variety of analytical and numerical techniques. The most used two typical methods are the waveguide modal approach [1,2] and the high frequency ray techniques [3,4]. However, the solutions obtained by these methods remain valid depending on the length of the cavity size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, in the open literature many cavity scattering problems have been analysed by using a variety of analytical and numerical techniques. The most used two typical methods are the waveguide modal approach [1,2] and the high frequency ray techniques [3,4]. However, the solutions obtained by these methods remain valid depending on the length of the cavity size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3), the electric and magnetic field at the point of r S of the antenna is replaced by the field at the point r P of the projection plane multiplied by divergence and phase factors [18][19][20][21]. If a radome encloses the antenna 'A' as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem serves as a simple model of duct structures such as jet engine intakes of aircrafts and cracks occurring on surfaces of general complicated bodies. Some of the diffraction problems involving twoand three-dimensional (2-D and 3-D) cavities have been analyzed thus far based on high-frequency techniques and numerical methods [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. It appears, however, that the solutions due to these approaches are not uniformly valid for arbitrary dimensions of the cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%