2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shoe midsole hardness, sex and age effects on lower extremity kinematics during running

Abstract: This file was dowloaded from the institutional repository Brage NIH -brage.bibsys.no/nih Nigg, B., Baltich, J., Maurer, C., Federolf, P. (2012) AbstractPrevious studies investigating the effects of shoe midsole hardness on running kinematics have often used male subjects from within a narrow age range. It is unknown whether shoe midsole hardness has the same kinematic effect on male and female runners as well as runners from different age categories. As sex and age have an effect on running kinematics, it is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
102
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(27 reference statements)
11
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…agreement with Kobayashi et al [21], decreased resistance about the ankle resulted in less stance-phase knee flexion. These results are also in agreement with footwear literature that reports less knee flexion in soft midsole (ie, more compliant) running shoes [28]. In theory, an AFO with spring-like material properties that stores energy during midstance and returns the maximum amount of energy during late stance/preswing should be most beneficial to the user [3,12,42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…agreement with Kobayashi et al [21], decreased resistance about the ankle resulted in less stance-phase knee flexion. These results are also in agreement with footwear literature that reports less knee flexion in soft midsole (ie, more compliant) running shoes [28]. In theory, an AFO with spring-like material properties that stores energy during midstance and returns the maximum amount of energy during late stance/preswing should be most beneficial to the user [3,12,42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…While we could not control this difference, stiffness and other mechanical properties of the cushioning material can affect running biomechanics (Baltich, Maurer, & Nigg, 2015;Cheung & Ng, 2008;Dinato, et al, 2015;Dixon, 2008;B.M. Nigg, Bahlsen, Luethi, & Stokes, 1987;B.M. Nigg, Baltich, Maurer, & Federolf, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[3] Several studies in the gait analysis domain have applied variations of this approach and various marker sets have been used across these studies. [1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The marker sets can be differentiated based on two major aspects. Firstly, whether the marker set covers the full body or body parts; full body marker sets were used most frequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, whether the marker set covers the full body or body parts; full body marker sets were used most frequently. [1,[3][4][5][6]11] Body part marker sets include unilateral placement on the lower extremity, [7,10,12] unilateral placement on the upper and lower extremity [9] and bilateral placement on the lower body and thorax. [8] Secondly, marker sets can be differentiated based on whether the markers are placed exclusively on specific anatomical landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation