2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.311447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shocks and Institutions in a Job Matching Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 These data are used to produce series for hours of work per person aged 15-64 across sectors in 1956 and 2000. 13 A few remarks are in order regarding the construction of these statistics. For 2000 there data on hours by sector for all countries.…”
Section: Labor Input Across Sectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 These data are used to produce series for hours of work per person aged 15-64 across sectors in 1956 and 2000. 13 A few remarks are in order regarding the construction of these statistics. For 2000 there data on hours by sector for all countries.…”
Section: Labor Input Across Sectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data for 2000 come from the 60 Sector Data Base, and the data for 1956 come from the 10 Sector Data Base 13. In these calculations I have included construction in the service sector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Þrm anticipates having to pay advertising costs when the worker quits, so would be worse off if the search decision did not affect the wage rate. However, because the Nash bargaining leads to a lower wage when the worker searches on the job, the Þrm is in fact better off if the worker does search as the wage difference more than offsets the anticipated advertising costs 16 . Furthermore, Þrms cannot afford to retain workers who have an outside offer in hand: as the new job's & is unobserved until the worker actually starts in the new job, the minimum wage that the old Þrm would have to pay to retain the worker is a wage that matches the expected wage E V {w} that the worker anticipates.…”
Section: Surplus and Wage Bargainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since in this non-competitive labor market individual wages are linked to individual output, this acceleration then also raises wage dispersion even among ex-ante equal workers, i.e., it raises the return to luck. 69 As in Jovanovic (1998), however, if the scrapping age of capital is endogenous, the model would display an offsetting force. This force is due to the fact that, when the growth rate is higher, machines become obsolete faster, and firms scrap machines earlier.…”
Section: Technological Heterogeneity and The Returns To Luckmentioning
confidence: 99%