2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5045018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock wave interaction with a cylindrical structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Qasrawi et al (2015) had neglected the overpressure on the rear surface of the cylinder as they were interested in providing a conservative estimate, Mulligan (2018) provides some empirical relations for the front and rear face of a circular cylinder for similar scaled ranges, based on small-scale experiments. C4 charges ranging from 0.09 kg to 0.272 kg, placed at a stand-off distance of 1.32 m from a 167 mm diameter cylinder, were used in these experiments (the reflected overpressures were in the range of 3–9.5 bar).…”
Section: Direct Loading On a Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Qasrawi et al (2015) had neglected the overpressure on the rear surface of the cylinder as they were interested in providing a conservative estimate, Mulligan (2018) provides some empirical relations for the front and rear face of a circular cylinder for similar scaled ranges, based on small-scale experiments. C4 charges ranging from 0.09 kg to 0.272 kg, placed at a stand-off distance of 1.32 m from a 167 mm diameter cylinder, were used in these experiments (the reflected overpressures were in the range of 3–9.5 bar).…”
Section: Direct Loading On a Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon, which is in addition to the free-field blast pressure decay, is termed as 'clearing' (Figure 1(b)) and this occurs due to the presence of the free edges in a finite-sized structure. The peak reflected overpressure p r of the blast load, however, 4 does not change as the reflection of an incident blast wave is effectively instantaneous and is unaffected by clearing (Mulligan, 2018). Now, consider a finite-sized structure such as a cuboid being impacted by a blast (Figure 1(b)).…”
Section: Clearing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qasrawi et al (2015) numerically worked on characterizing the loading for relevant parameters of stand-alone circular columns and developed sinusoidal curve fits to estimate the equivalent reflected pressure and impulse. The experimental work of Mulligan (2018) put forward a different relation to predict the pressure ratio across the circumference of the cylinder by taking into account the influence of angle of incidence and the wake region in the rear face. Gauch et al (2020) developed analytical equations for calculating the load on the surface of a cylinder due to the impact of a pressure wave having an arbitrary shape, amplitude and time duration.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%