Shock Waves 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85168-4_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock-tube development for high-pressure and low-temperature chemical kinetics experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2015; Titova, Kuleshov & Starik, 2011;Cord et al, 2012;de Vries et al, 2009). According to Merchant et al (2015), Reactions 6 (R6) and 7 (R7) serve as two initiation reactions in low-temperature propane oxidation.…”
Section: Reaction Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2015; Titova, Kuleshov & Starik, 2011;Cord et al, 2012;de Vries et al, 2009). According to Merchant et al (2015), Reactions 6 (R6) and 7 (R7) serve as two initiation reactions in low-temperature propane oxidation.…”
Section: Reaction Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational domain represents the entire geometry of the high-pressure shock-tube test facility at the Texas A&M University described in detail by de Vries et al (2007) and Aul (2009). The shock tube consists of a 2.46-m-long driver section with an internal diameter of 7.62 cm and a 4.72-m-long driven section with an internal diameter of 15.24 cm.…”
Section: Computational Domain/gridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shock-tube model was also validated with experimental measurements conducted at the Texas A&M shock-tube facility. The experimental pressure profiles were obtained at a location 1.6 cm from the end-wall using the equipment detailed by de Vries et al (2007) and Aul (2009). Target reflected-shock temperatures and pressures were achieved through the use of Lexan diaphragms (2.5 atm) or aluminum diaphragms (17 atm).…”
Section: Validation Of Shock-tube Model With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%