1955
DOI: 10.1037/h0041356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock for right and wrong responses during learning and extinction in human subjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1959
1959
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is that shock-wrong groups always learn faster than do shockright groups, an assumption which is not borne out by the available evidence. While this is usually the case, several experiments have resulted in shock-right being the superior condition for learning (Feldman, 1954;Tolman et al, 1932), and in still others, no difference has been observed between shock-right and shock-wrong groups (e.g., Freeburne & Schneider, 1955). A review of earlier studies suggests that intensity of the noxious stimulus employed may be the basis of these conflicting findings (see e.g., Muenzinger & Newcomb, 1935).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is that shock-wrong groups always learn faster than do shockright groups, an assumption which is not borne out by the available evidence. While this is usually the case, several experiments have resulted in shock-right being the superior condition for learning (Feldman, 1954;Tolman et al, 1932), and in still others, no difference has been observed between shock-right and shock-wrong groups (e.g., Freeburne & Schneider, 1955). A review of earlier studies suggests that intensity of the noxious stimulus employed may be the basis of these conflicting findings (see e.g., Muenzinger & Newcomb, 1935).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%