1961
DOI: 10.1037/h0047515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of shock in human maze learning.

Abstract: The early observation of Tolman, Hall, and Bretnall (1932) that electric shock facilitates learning, even when the shocks follow correct responses, has been confirmed by an impressive number of subsequent investigations (e.g.,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Punishment has been given to human subjects under shock-right and shockwrong conditions in simple maze learning situations, and learning was found to be superior for shock-right with low shock intensity, but superior for shockwrong with high shock intensity (Feldman, 1961). Freeburne and Schneider (1955) found that shock-right, shockwrong, and shock for both right and wrong responses facilitated learning compared to a no-shock condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Punishment has been given to human subjects under shock-right and shockwrong conditions in simple maze learning situations, and learning was found to be superior for shock-right with low shock intensity, but superior for shockwrong with high shock intensity (Feldman, 1961). Freeburne and Schneider (1955) found that shock-right, shockwrong, and shock for both right and wrong responses facilitated learning compared to a no-shock condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muenzinger's original formulation appears to be generally accepted (e.g., Feldman, 1961;Young, 1961), despite more recent findings which question its generality (Muenzinger & Baxter, 1957;Muenzinger, Brown, Crow, & Powloski, 1952;Muenzinger & Powloski, 1951;Wischner, 1947). Wischner has shown that with a noncorrection procedure, as contrasted with the correction procedure typically em-ployed by Muenzinger, shock for the correct response retards, rather than facilitates discrimination learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feldman observed insignificant differences between physiological activity associated with shock-correct (shock intensity constant) and that associated with shock-wrong, although these two shock conditions had different effects on learning. The sensitivity of Feldman's (1961) physiological measures was demonstrated in the same experiment by their discrimination between electric shocks of different intensities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…24-5). Feldman's (1961) experiment was another study from our laboratory in which performance (and learning) were significantly affected by conditions that were unaccompanied by any observable shift in ANS functions. Feldman observed insignificant differences between physiological activity associated with shock-correct (shock intensity constant) and that associated with shock-wrong, although these two shock conditions had different effects on learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%