2021
DOI: 10.3390/insects12020157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifts in Ecological Dominance between Two Lepidopteran Species in Refuge Areas of Bt Cotton

Abstract: Competition behavior involving agricultural pest species has long been viewed as a powerful selective force that drives ecological and phenotypic diversity. In this context, a Game Theory-based approach may be useful to describe the decision-making dilemma of a competitor with impacts to guarantee its superiority in terms of ecological dominance or sharing of the food resource with its competitor. In an attempt to elucidate the consequences of competitive dynamics for the ecological dominance of these species … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[72][73][74] These cause high levels of mortality in susceptible and heterozygous larvae, even when initially fed with non-Bt corn for a period of 10 days, 65 and have a high effectiveness in the field. 37 Studies that aim to understand larval movement between plants and the interactions with other trophic levels, 22,26 such as other pest species 75 and Bt plant physiology, 76 are necessary to predict the consequences on resistance evolution. This should allow more informed recommendations for the intercropping of ruzigrass with Bt or non-Bt corn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[72][73][74] These cause high levels of mortality in susceptible and heterozygous larvae, even when initially fed with non-Bt corn for a period of 10 days, 65 and have a high effectiveness in the field. 37 Studies that aim to understand larval movement between plants and the interactions with other trophic levels, 22,26 such as other pest species 75 and Bt plant physiology, 76 are necessary to predict the consequences on resistance evolution. This should allow more informed recommendations for the intercropping of ruzigrass with Bt or non-Bt corn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent or significantly delay insect resistance to Bt crops, such as cotton, corn, or soybean, refuge areas should be planted with non-Bt plants and cover a significant percentage of the acreage in the field [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Malaquias et al [ 8 ] analyzed how the adoption of insecticide and the competition between the lepidopteran species S. frugiperda and H. armigera could impact the production of susceptible individuals in refuge areas of Bt cotton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent or significantly delay insect resistance to Bt crops, such as cotton, corn, or soybean, refuge areas should be planted with non-Bt plants and cover a significant percentage of the acreage in the field [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Malaquias et al [ 8 ] analyzed how the adoption of insecticide and the competition between the lepidopteran species S. frugiperda and H. armigera could impact the production of susceptible individuals in refuge areas of Bt cotton. They warned that ecological dominance may diverge due to resistance alleles because insecticide resistance in S. frugiperda could impact the production of susceptible H. armigera individuals on a large scale in refuge areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bulk of Bt crops is grown in the USA, Brazil, Argentina, India, Canada, and China (ISAAA, 2016). Resistance evolution in targeted insects, negating the toxicity of Bt crops, is a great concern (Malaquias et al, 2021). In some cases, if steps are not taken to manage the evolutionary process, resistance could render Bt crops ineffective in a few insect generations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%