2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01374.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting Sands: Sea Level Rise, Maritime Boundaries and Inter-State Conflict

Abstract: While the international security dimensions of climate change have received an increasing amount of attention, one impact that has not been widely discussed is the role that sea level rise could play in rendering maritime boundaries around the globe uncertain. The argument of this article is that this confusion of maritime boundaries could have potentially significant consequences in creating inter-state disputes, possibly leading to conflicts and international instability. This article will outline how sea le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…138 This could take the form of either a UN General Assembly resolution on stable maritime zones 136 The Spratly Archipelago are claimed in their entirety or partially by Vietnam, China, Taiwan, Malaysia, the Philippines and Brunei, see Lusthaus (2010). 138 This could take the form of either a UN General Assembly resolution on stable maritime zones 136 The Spratly Archipelago are claimed in their entirety or partially by Vietnam, China, Taiwan, Malaysia, the Philippines and Brunei, see Lusthaus (2010).…”
Section: Collective Implementation Mechanisms Of a New Regime Of Stabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…138 This could take the form of either a UN General Assembly resolution on stable maritime zones 136 The Spratly Archipelago are claimed in their entirety or partially by Vietnam, China, Taiwan, Malaysia, the Philippines and Brunei, see Lusthaus (2010). 138 This could take the form of either a UN General Assembly resolution on stable maritime zones 136 The Spratly Archipelago are claimed in their entirety or partially by Vietnam, China, Taiwan, Malaysia, the Philippines and Brunei, see Lusthaus (2010).…”
Section: Collective Implementation Mechanisms Of a New Regime Of Stabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By and large, however, this work has not considered what rights, if any, displaced persons and communities should have to their maritime zones after their territories become uninhabitable (though see Ödalen 2014). Some political scientists have considered the impact of sea level rise on maritime zones, but their primary focus has been on potential disputes over the issue and whether these are likely to increase interstate conflict (e.g., Lusthaus 2010).…”
Section: Figure 1 Exclusive Economic Zones In the Pacificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of "eternal litigation" increases with ambulatory baselines, and with this, the aforementioned global stability that is so desired is threatened. In addition to these claims of extensive costs, it can be argued that the "wasteful spending" [19] undertaken by Japan in protecting Okino-tori Shima justifies having the boundaries frozen. Perhaps not specifically for this particularly tentative claim, but for other lowtide elevations and drying reefs that risk being submerged in the coming decades, the freezing of boundaries could prove to be a more affordable choice than attempting to ensure that their low-lying objects can support the economic activity required for it to maintain its status under UNCLOS [25].…”
Section: Fixed Baselines: Business As Usualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notion has to be weighed up against the aforementioned idea of global stability. But it appears that this approach would resolve many issues that have plagued the international community, and more consistent proposed regime [19]. The most obvious benefit to be had in freezing baselines would be the consistency and certainty it would entail.…”
Section: Freezing Baselines: the Best Waforwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation