2008
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting Prevalence of Major Diarrheal Pathogens in Patients Seeking Hospital Care during Floods in 1998, 2004, and 2007 in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract: Bangladesh experienced severe flooding and diarrheal epidemics in 2007. We compared flood data from 2007 with 2004 and 1998 for diarrheal patients attending the ICDDR,B hospital in Dhaka. In 2007, Vibrio cholerae O1 (33%), rotavirus (12%), and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) (12%) were most prevalent. More severe dehydration was seen in 2007 compared with 2004 and 1998 (P < 0.001). In 2007, V. cholerae O1 Inaba (52%) and Ogawa (48%) were seen, whereas in 2004 and 1998 it was primarily Inaba and the Oga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
98
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
98
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19][20][21][22] On the other hand typical EPEC, a wellrecognized cause of infantile diarrhea, 4 contributed much less during the current study compared with atypical EPEC in previous studies. 23,24 Similar results have been observed in Bangladesh where the majority of ETEC producing LT, followed by LT + ST and ST producing were predominantly associated with flood associated diarrheal cases 25 compared with previous studies from China, India, Mexico, Myanmar, and Pakistan where strains predominantly produced ST. 26 The association of EAEC with diarrhea has not been frequently reported, 27 however in our study EAEC is one of the most frequently isolated pathotype in sporadic cases, whereas EPEC is from flood affected cases. Furthermore, younger children ( 5 years of age) are more often affected by EAEC than older children in both the flood affected and non-flood affected areas (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…[18][19][20][21][22] On the other hand typical EPEC, a wellrecognized cause of infantile diarrhea, 4 contributed much less during the current study compared with atypical EPEC in previous studies. 23,24 Similar results have been observed in Bangladesh where the majority of ETEC producing LT, followed by LT + ST and ST producing were predominantly associated with flood associated diarrheal cases 25 compared with previous studies from China, India, Mexico, Myanmar, and Pakistan where strains predominantly produced ST. 26 The association of EAEC with diarrhea has not been frequently reported, 27 however in our study EAEC is one of the most frequently isolated pathotype in sporadic cases, whereas EPEC is from flood affected cases. Furthermore, younger children ( 5 years of age) are more often affected by EAEC than older children in both the flood affected and non-flood affected areas (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Dominance of the ST-expressing ETEC has been documented in Egypt, Bangladesh, and Tunisia [11,20,21]. However, a recent study conducted in Bangladesh concluded that ETEC strains have shifted from ST-producers to significantly more LTproducing strains similar to those observed in Latin American countries, such as Mexico, Peru, and Argentina, which have shown a high prevalence of LT-producing ETEC [22,11,23]. The results of this study also showed the predominance of the STproducing strains in the 1988 isolates, but a significant increase in the detection rate of the LTproducers was observed among the 1998 ETEC isolates, and those previously reported [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In Bangladesh, monsoon (July to October) is the important season when spread of diarrhoea is noticed. There were extensive floods during the monsoons of 1988, 1998(Schwartz et al 2006Harris et al 2008). During these periods, 25-50% of Bangladesh was submerged, resulting in the destruction of infrastructure, contamination of water, and epidemics of diarrhoeal illness.…”
Section: Indirect Intangible Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%