1978
DOI: 10.3208/sandf1972.18.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear Moduli of Sands under Cyclic Torsional Shear Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
127
0
17

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
127
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…For the deˆnition of the void ratio function, various approaches have been proposed, namely those by Hardin and Richart (1963) and Iwasaki et al (1978), by Hardin (1978) and Chung et al (1984), and by Jamiolkowski et al (1991) and Lo Presti (1995). These can be directly applied when no speciˆc study is carried out to determine which is most suitable for the soil in study, or serve as a starting point for a more speciˆc analysis.…”
Section: Assessment Of Sampling Quality By Comparison Of Seismic Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the deˆnition of the void ratio function, various approaches have been proposed, namely those by Hardin and Richart (1963) and Iwasaki et al (1978), by Hardin (1978) and Chung et al (1984), and by Jamiolkowski et al (1991) and Lo Presti (1995). These can be directly applied when no speciˆc study is carried out to determine which is most suitable for the soil in study, or serve as a starting point for a more speciˆc analysis.…”
Section: Assessment Of Sampling Quality By Comparison Of Seismic Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where pr is a reference pressure (=1.0 kPa) and F(e) is a function to remove scattering of void ratio, e, among test specimens (Hardin and Richart, 1963;Iwasaki et al, 1978), and given as:…”
Section: Elastic Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain additional modifications (the equations marked with an asterisk in Table 1) were made to this model in order to improve the simulation of experimental data, and capture aspects of sand behaviour that are important in the analysis of foundations (Loukidis, 2006;Loukidis & Salgado, 2009a). The model parameters were determined for two sands: air-pluviated/dry-deposited Toyoura sand (Iwasaki et al, 1978;Fukushima & Tatsuoka, 1984;Lam & Tatsuoka, 1988;Yoshimine et al, 1998) and water-pluviated/slurry-deposited clean Ottawa sand (Carraro et al, 2003;Carraro, 2004;Murthy, 2006;Murthy et al, 2007). Toyoura sand has mean particle size D 50 % 0 .…”
Section: Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%