2012
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear‐induced detachment of biofilms from hollow fiber silicone membranes

Abstract: A suite of techniques was utilized to evaluate the correlation between biofilm physiology, fluid-induced shear stress, and detachment in hollow fiber membrane aerated bioreactors. Two monoculture species biofilms were grown on silicone fibers in a hollow fiber membrane aerated bioreactors (HfMBR) to assess detachment under laminar fluid flow conditions. Both physiology (biofilm thickness and roughness) and nutrient mass transport data indicated the presence of a steady state mature biofilm after 3 weeks of dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus of the study was not on the effect of biofilm properties or cultivation time on detachment as is extensively reported recently [41][42][43]. Rather, the results established that reproducibility with respect to detachment was possible, provided appropriate methods were used to classify detached particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The focus of the study was not on the effect of biofilm properties or cultivation time on detachment as is extensively reported recently [41][42][43]. Rather, the results established that reproducibility with respect to detachment was possible, provided appropriate methods were used to classify detached particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These same simulations do show a significant reduction in fluid velocity deep within the polymeric bulk; however, since this will only affect the transport of nutrients, the concentration of which is anyway very low deep within the film, this omission will make negligible difference to biofilm growth. The second deficiency in this model is that biomass detachment due to shear stresses has not been incorporated, although this is known to partly control biofilm thickness [44,45]. There is no reason why this cannot be introduced for a future work, possibly following the particle-removal criterion of Alpkvist and Klapper [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,2025 For example, biofilms developed under high shear stress up to 10 Pa were shown to be cohesively stronger. 15,21 The reduction of biofilm thickness was observed under a continuous exposure to shear stress up to 0.9 Pa. 21,22 During disinfectant exposure, shear can accelerate biofilm–disinfectant reaction by enhancing the mass transfer of disinfectant into the biofilms, 26 presumably leading to significant biofilm property variation. However, the combined effect of disinfectant exposure and shear stress on properties of biofilm grown under low-nutrient conditions over a longer time appears to be unreported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%