Shear bond strength of a "solvent-free" adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems

Koliniotou-Koumpia, Eugenia; Kouros, Pantelis; Koumpia, Effimia; Helvatzoglou-Antoniades, Maria

doi:10.1590/1677-3225v13n1a13

Cited by 17 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The self‐etch adhesive slightly increased surface roughness after laser ablation, and incompletely removed the smear layer following SiC pretreament. One previous study showed that All‐In‐One adhesive provided a hybrid layer and excellent penetration into the dentin tubules (Koliniotou‐Koumpia et al, ). Mild etching after the application of Vertise Flow created irregularities on enamel surfaces pretreated with laser and partly removed the smear layer on the SiC‐pretreated dentin.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of laser preparation on adhesion of a self‐adhesive flowable composite resin to primary teeth

Memarpour

Shafıei

Razmjoei

et al. 2016

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the study was to evaluate the adhesion of a self-adhering flowable composite resin to primary tooth enamel and dentin after silicon carbide paper (SiC) and laser pretreatment. Adhesive properties were evaluated as shear bond strength (SBS) and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) characteristics. A total 120 primary canine teeth were randomly divided into two groups to study enamel and dentin. Each group was divided into 6 subgroups (n = 10) according to type of surface preparation (SiC or Er:YAG laser) of enamel or dentin. Three methods were used to build cylinders of restoration on tooth surface: OptiBond All-In-One + Premise Flowable composite, OptiBond All-In-One + Vertise Flow and Vertise flow. After restoration, samples were tested for SBS and failure mode. Twenty eight samples were examined by SEM. The results of the study showed SBS of Vertise Flow was lower than others in enamel and dentin samples pretreated with SiC and in dentin samples pretreated with laser (P < 0.001). Compared to SiC pretreatment, laser pretreatment led to a significantly higher SBS with Vertise Flow on enamel (P < 0.001). Vertise Flow associated with the adhesive led to a higher SBS in enamel and dentin compared to Vertise Flow alone. Adhesive and mixed failure modes were observed more frequently in Vertise Flow groups. SEM images showed that Vertise Flow led to more irregularities on enamel and more open dentinal tubules after laser ablation compared SiC pretreatment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of laser preparation on adhesion of a self‐adhesive flowable composite resin to primary teeth

Memarpour

Shafıei

Razmjoei

et al. 2016

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Shear bond strength (SBS) is a mechanical test of the adhesive interphase that can provide an indication of the bond integrity between esthetic restorations and dentin surface. Reliable results were achieved in previous researches studying dentin-adhesives interphase (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 78%

The influence of acid etching or chitosan dentin surface treatments on dentin wettability and shear bond strength of self- etch adhesives

Abuelenain

2018

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Koliniotou-Koumpia et al evaluated a solvent free self-etch adhesive (Bond 1 SF), an ethanol self-etch adhesive (Futurabond M), and a water-acetoneethanol self-etch adhesive (Optibond All-In-One) [17]. They found that solvent free self-etch (Bond 1 SF) had lower SBS as compared to the other two groups.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

Yahya

Shekh

2019

ADUM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and to analyse the failure mode at the resindentine interface of different dental adhesive systems. A total of 75 sound premolar teeth were selected and randomly assigned into five different adhesive groups (n=15): OptiBond Solo (OBS, total-etch), OptiBond Versa (OBV, two-bottles, self-etch), Adhe SE Ivoclar (ADHE, two-bottles, self-etch), G-Bond (GB, one-bottle, selfetch), and OptiBond All in One (OBO, one-bottle, self-etch). The occlusal surface of each tooth was flattened and composite resin cylinder (4x2 mm) was built up on the flat dentine surface using a custom made mould. The specimens were then subjected to 500 thermal cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C and dwell time of 20s. The SBS test was conducted using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett T3 Test. Failure mode was determined as adhesive, cohesive or mixed mode using a stereomicroscope and the data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. The total-etch (OBS) had significantly higher value of SBS than the two self-etch (ADHE and GB) adhesive systems. Within the self-etch systems, OBV showed significantly higher SBS value compared to ADHE and GB. There were no statistically significant differences between types of failure mode (p > 0.05) and adhesive group. It can be concluded that the different compositions in the self-etch adhesive materials may contribute to the different SBS value. The failure modes detected within all tested groups did not show clinically important differences.

show abstract

Shear bond strength of a "solvent-free" adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems

Cited by 17 publications

References 22 publications

Effect of laser preparation on adhesion of a self‐adhesive flowable composite resin to primary teeth

Effect of laser preparation on adhesion of a self‐adhesive flowable composite resin to primary teeth

The influence of acid etching or chitosan dentin surface treatments on dentin wettability and shear bond strength of self- etch adhesives

Untitled

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About